and the anonymous reviewers of CRR for their comments and suggestions that helped me, I hope, to improve this article. themselves as "Muslims" because of their family backgrounds, their personal attachments, their ethnic and group allegiances, or the social and cultural environments in which they were raised (Gianni, Giugni, and Michel, 2015). These Muslims are often categorized as "cultural" or "nominal" Muslims (Ruthven, 1997). However, in public debates, Muslims are represented very differently. They are essentialized, viewed as being internally consistent, clearly bounded, natural, and unchangeable religious subjects. The essentialization of Muslims entails an overculturalization of their agency and a deterministic view of its impact on secular institutions. In particular, these representations have undemocratic, performative effects for they crystallize Muslims' social and political visibility in a way that calls into question their social and political integration 1. These negative social and political representations of Muslims are at the core of what, broadly speaking, can be called the "Muslim Question." Unsurprisingly, this expression is very controversial. It harkens to the Jewish Question and to the Shoah, and for this reason it must be used very carefully. In particular, it should not be used to compare historical experiences, discourses, and representations of Jewish and Muslims alterities, which are particular and raise different issues. There are two uses of the notion of the 'Muslim Question': the first focuses on the social, legal, and political problems raised by the accommodation of Muslims in Western societies, with an emphasis put on the issues raised by Muslim immigration and Islam for 1 The distinctive aspect of performative utterances is that they do not merely name, they also perform what they are naming and represent it at the same time (Hermansen, 2004: 390). The notion of performative effects refers here to the discursive constructions of normative conception of Muslimness and the subject-positions attached to them in given polities or societies. For an exemple of the use of this analytical category, see Ringrose and Renold (2010).