Objective We sought to identify a relationship between skull base height and anterior ethmoid artery (AEA) anatomy. Study Design Retrospective radiologic chart review. Setting University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences. Subjects Patients seen in a tertiary rhinology clinic between September 2014 and October 2015. Methods Review of 101 maxillofacial computed tomography scans with institutional review board approval. Skull base height and AEA locations were measured on each side. Prevalence of the AEA outside of the skull base and distance of the AEA from skull base were calculated and compared with Keros classification using χ testing. Comparisons of skull base height between sexes and age and distance between skull base and the AEA among Keros 2 and Keros 3 patients were made using an unpaired, 2-tailed t test. Results The AEA was located below the skull base in 25.7% of cases and more often in Keros type 3 (55%) than in Keros type 2 (29.5%) or Keros type 1 (0%) ( P < .05). Male patients were significantly more likely to have a greater average skull base height (5.25 vs 4.28 mm) and to have AEAs below the skull base (38.4% vs 14.8%). In addition, the distance of the AEA from the skull base was significantly higher in Keros type 3 patients compared with Keros type 2 patients (4.55 vs 3.42 mm, P = .001). Conclusions Variations in the AEA pathway occur more in male patients and those with higher Keros classifications. The distance between the variant AEA and the skull base increases with higher Keros classification. Keros classification can yield insight to the location of the AEA.
The OOPS index makes it possible to accurately prognosticate hearing outcomes in adult and pediatric patients undergoing ossiculoplasty in both the short term and the long term.
Long-term complications are a significant consideration in all the patients undergoing ossiculoplasty. Our data suggest that tobacco smoking, Eustachian tube dysfunction, and an unexpectedly poor hearing result on the first postoperative audiogram are all important risk factors for the development of significant complications.
Reestablishing anterior rectus fascial integrity remains a clinical challenge after transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap breast reconstruction. The main concerns include herniation and bulging due to abdominal weakness. Mesh-assisted closure of the fascial defect has improved bulging and herniation rates but infection, extrusion, and encapsulation are serious concerns with mesh use. Biologic tissue matrices may overcome some of these mesh-related complications. The initial experience of using Strattice for fascial closure after TRAM flap procedure is described in this article. Strattice was in-lain and sutured between the anterior and posterior layers of the rectus fascia, at the rectus muscle donor site. The abdominal wall was closed with progressive tension sutures. Postoperative complications at the donor site were assessed. A total of 16 unilateral and 9 bilateral reconstructions were performed in 25 patients. Length of hospital stay was 2 to 3 days which is shorter than with mesh repair (typically 4-5 days). During a mean follow-up period of 14.0 months, complications occurred in 7 patients (28%): seroma formation (2), minor skin separation (2), superficial skin infection (2), and superficial wound dehiscence (1). Complications were not directly related to Strattice and all, except one (superficial skin infection), were resolved without surgical intervention. In all patients, routine abdominal functions were restored 4 months postoperatively. Strattice is a safe, alternative option to synthetic mesh for fascial repair following TRAM flap breast reconstruction. When used in conjunction with progressive tension suture closure of the abdominal wall, dynamic reconstruction of the abdominal wall with resumption of abdominal function is possible with Strattice.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.