Introduction The ability of people with Parkinson's Disease (PWPD) to perceive and identify impairments related to communication and swallowing is often impaired. This impairment prolongs the time to diagnosis of dysphonia and dysphagia, and can delay implementation of speech or swallowing therapy. We have limited knowledge of how different motor phenotypes of PD impact speech, voice and swallowing, nor how PWPD perceive these impacts. The purpose of this study was to identify how perceptions of speech and voice impairments predict dysphagia in PD, and how those perceptions differ between motor phenotypes. Methods 38 PWPD completed clinical surveys including V-RQOL, DHI, and a speech, voice, and swallow symptom questionnaire. Participants were categorized as either tremor dominant (TD) or non-tremor dominant (NTD) phenotypes. Multiple regression and MANOVA were utilized to identify predictors of dysphagia perceptions, and for differentiating between motor phenotype based on perceptual severity. Results Perceptions of speech and voice impairment predicted perceptions of swallow impairment regardless of phenotype ( p < .05, CI = 0.08–0.77). NTD participants reported significantly more communication and swallowing impairments than TD ( p < .05) and perceived communication impairment severity was the strongest predictor of group classification (OR = 0.50). The survey battery displayed a robust discriminatory ability between phenotype (AUC = 0.87, CI = 0.76–0.98). Conclusion The use of a noninvasive and cost-efficient survey battery may be useful in predicting patient perceived swallow impairment in PWPD. Speech, voice, and swallow impairments based on survey responses were found to differ between motor phenotypes.

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of transcutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) on the timing of laryngeal vestibule closure during the pharyngeal stage of swallowing in healthy adults. The theoretical framework proposed that NMES applied to these muscles would present a perturbation to laryngeal vestibular closure reaction time (the amount of time for the laryngeal vestibule to close once the swallowing reflex has been triggered) by providing an antagonistic force to the direction of vestibule closure.MethodsNine healthy adults (2 males, 7 females) received ten consecutive stimulations applied to the submandibular hyolaryngeal muscles while performing dry swallows. Laryngeal vestibule closure reaction time (LVCrt) and the laryngeal vestibule closure duration (LVCd) were measured from videoflouroscopic images pre-stimulation and post-stimulation.ResultsResults indicated a significant effect of stimulation on LVCrt but not LVCd. LVCrt was significantly reduced (timing was faster) during swallows immediately after stimulation compared to pre-stimulation.ConclusionsFindings from this study support the supposition that laryngeal muscles respond to perturbations via adaptation learning, which might be used for rehabilitation of neuromuscular swallowing impairment. This pilot study supports the need for further research.

Background: Dysphagia in Parkinson's disease (PD) is a common manifestation, particularly in advanced disease stages. However, the pathophysiology and time course of dysphagia progression remains unclear in non-advanced disease stages (e.g., Hoehn & Yahr stages I-III). Conflicting reports from investigations of the perception of dysphagia in people with PD further complicates our understanding of dysphagia in this population. Objective: The objectives of this research were to evaluate the ability of screening tools to detect swallowing impairments and how laryngeal kinematics predict the occurrence of abnormal swallowing events. Methods: 14 individuals with non-advanced PD, no previous history of dysphagia diagnosis, and self-reported difficulty swallowing participated. The Swallow Disturbance Questionnaire (SDQ) and 3-oz water swallow test (WSST) were administered, along with a videoflouroscopic swallow study (VFSS). Laryngeal kinematics were represented by laryngeal vestibule closure reaction time (LVrt) and laryngeal vestibule closure duration (LVCd). The Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) was used to quantify airway invasion. Results: A logistic regression indicated a significant model of predicting airway invasion from our predictors (p = 0.003). LVrt and SDQ (p < 0.05) provided the largest impact (OR = 1.11; 1.17). The WSST showed no significance in predicting swallow impairment (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Decreased airway safety related to laryngeal kinematic function in PD may be manifesting at non-advanced disease stages to varied degrees. Our results support expectations of dysphagia manifestation in PD although screening practices may not adequately identify impairment. Future research should target specific laryngeal characteristics within this population to better understand the physiological cause of swallowing impairment and developof targeted interventions.

No abstract

PurposeTo identify how speech‐language pathologists (SLPs) in the United States are screening for and identifying dysphagia. To do this, we examined the approaches most often used to screen for dysphagia and the influence of contextual factors such as setting, continuing education and means of staying up to date with the most current literature on screening approaches.MethodA web‐based survey composed of 32 questions was developed and field tested for content, relevance and workflow. The survey was distributed online, via social media, online SLP forums and through the American Speech‐Language‐Hearing Association's Special Interest Group 13 (swallowing disorders). One hundred and thirty‐seven clinicians from the United States completed the survey and were included for analysis using descriptive statistics and linear regression modelling to assess associations of continuing education and years practicing with screening protocols and consumption of evidence.ResultsRespondents worked in a variety of settings, including acute care, skilled nursing facilities, and inpatient rehabilitation. Most respondents worked with adult populations (88%). The most common screening protocols reported were a volume‐dependent water swallow test (74%), subjective patient report (66%), and trials of solids/liquids (49%). Twenty‐four percent (24%) reported using a questionnaire, the Eating Assessment Tool (80%) being most common. How clinicians consume their evidence was significantly associated with the types of screening approaches used. Continuing education hours were significantly associated with dysphagia screening protocol choice (p < 0.001) and how clinicians stayed up to date with evidence (p < 0.001).ConclusionsResults from this study provide an in‐depth look at the choices clinicians are making in the field regarding how to effectively screen patients for the presence of dysphagia. Contextual factors such as evidence base consumption patterns should serve researchers to continue seeking alternative ways to share evidence with clinicians, accessibly. Associations between continuing education and protocol choice show the need for continued evidence‐based and high‐quality continuing education opportunities.WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS This study provides an in‐depth look at the choices clinicians are making in the field regarding effective dysphagia screening practices. Clinician screening choices are examined with contextual factors such as evidence base consumption patterns and continuing education. This paper increases knowledge of the most used dysphagia screening practices and context for clinicians and researchers to improve use, evidence and dissemination of best practices.