To investigate the toxicity profile and establish an optimal dosing schedule of zotiraciclib with temozolomide (TMZ) in patients with recurrent high-grade astrocytoma.Experimental Design: This two-stage phase 1 trial determined the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of zotiraciclib combined with either dose-dense (Arm1) or metronomic (Arm2) TMZ using a Bayesian Optimal Interval design; then a randomized cohortexpansion compared the progression-free survival rate at 4 month (PFS4) of the two arms for an efficient determination of a TMZ schedule to combine with zotiraciclib at MTD. Pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacogenomic (PG) profiling were included. Patient-reported outcome was evaluated by longitudinal symptom burden.Results: Fifty-three patients were enrolled. Dose-limiting toxicities were neutropenia, diarrhea, elevated liver enzymes, and fatigue. MTD of zotiraciclib was 250mg in both arms and thus selected for the cohort expansion. Dose-dense TMZ plus zotiraciclib (PSF4 40%) compared favorably with metronomic TMZ (PFS4 25%). Symptom burden worsened at Cycle 2 but stabilized by Cycle 4 in both arms. A significant decrease in absolute neutrophil count and neutrophil reactive oxygen species production occurred 12-24 hours after an oral dose of zotiraciclib but both recovered by 72 hours. PK/PG analyses revealed that the CYP1A2_5347T>C (rs2470890) polymorphism was associated with higher AUC inf value.Conclusions: Zotiraciclib combined with TMZ is safe in patients with recurrent highgrade astrocytomas. Zotiraciclib-induced neutropenia can be profound but mostly transient, warranting close monitoring rather than treatment discontinuation. Once validated, polymorphisms predicting drug metabolism may allow personalized dosing of zotiraciclib.

Objective: To assess the cytokine and viral profiles of effusions and peripheral blood among patients diagnosed with HIV and Kaposi sarcoma herpesvirus [KSHV, also known as human herpesvirus 8 (HHV-8)]-associated conditions. Design: Retrospective comparative study evaluating clinicopathologic findings in patients with HIV and KSHV-associated conditions presenting with an effusion between 2010 and 2018. Methods: Paired peripheral blood and effusion samples collected at the time of pathological diagnosis of KSHV-associated conditions [Kaposi sarcoma, KSHV-associated multicentric Castleman disease (KSHV-MCD), primary effusion lymphoma (PEL), or KSHV-associated inflammatory cytokine syndrome (KICS)] were evaluated for disease-specific and compartment-specific (effusion vs. blood) characteristics. We assessed 12 cytokines, KSHV viral DNA (KSHV-VL), and Epstein--Barr virus (EBV) viral DNA (EBV-VL). Results: Nine patients had PEL, five patients had KSHV-MCD, and eight patients met criteria for KICS; all but one patient had concurrent Kaposi sarcoma in addition to these conditions. PEL effusions had substantially higher levels of IL-13 (median 16.9 pg/ml; interquartile range 9.7--26.9 pg/ml) compared with KSHV-MCD (median <0.114 pg/ml; P = 0.0037) or KICS (median <0.114 pg/ml; P = 0.0003) effusions. IL-13 was also higher in PEL effusions as compared with serum (median <0.12 ng/ml; P = 0.007). KSHV-VL levels were significantly higher in PEL effusions as compared with KICS effusions (median 31 × 106 vs. 569 copies/million-cell equivalent; P = 0.0005) or KSHV-MCD effusions (median 231,884 copies/million-cell equivalent; P = 0.02). Conclusion: PEL effusions had a distinct profile as compared to other KSHV-associated diseases with regard to elevated IL-13 and KSHV-VL. These findings may provide insights into PEL pathogenesis and aid in diagnosis.

In this set of investigations, most employers failed to implement common elements of illness prevention programs. Over 80% clearly did not rely on national standard approaches to heat illness prevention.

Background Cognitive impairments are a common burden for patients with primary CNS tumors. Neuropsychological assessment batteries can be too lengthy, which limits their use as an objective measure of cognition during routine care. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and utility of the brief Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in routine in-person and telehealth visits (as a result of the global COVID-19 pandemic) with neuro-oncology patients. Methods 71 adults with primary CNS tumors completed MoCA testing in-person (n=47) and via telehealth (n=24). Patient-reported outcomes (PROs), including symptom burden and interference, perceived cognition, general health status, and anxiety and depression, were and correlation analysis were included in this study. Feasibility was assessed through a provider satisfaction questionnaire. Results Patients were primarily White (83%), college-educated (71%) males (54%) with high grade tumors (66%). The average total score on the MoCA administered in-person was 25 (range: 6-30), with 34% classified as abnormal, and the average total score via telehealth was 26 (range: 12-30), with 29% classified as abnormal. Providers reported satisfaction in using the MoCA during routine clinical care, both in-person and via telehealth. Lower MoCA scores correlated with worse symptom severity, KPS, age, education, and previous treatment. Conclusions The MoCA was feasible in clinical and telehealth settings, and its relationship to clinical characteristics and PROs highlight the need for both objective and patient-reported measures of cognition to understand the overall cognitive profile of a patient with a CNS tumor.