Percutaneous cholecystostomy offers a potentially important therapeutic modality for critically ill patients with acute cholecystitis who represent a high risk for general anaesthesia. The aim of the study was to assess experience with percutaneous cholecystostomy in resolving the acute episode of cholecystitis without operative intervention. Twenty-two consecutive patients with a clinical diagnosis of acute cholecystitis underwent the procedure. All were at high risk for general anaesthesia, and all but one developed cholecystitis while hospitalized for another co-morbid condition; 14 were in an intensive care unit. Twenty-one of the 22 patients proved to have acute cholecystitis (11 acalculous, ten cholelithiasis). There were no acute technical complications. Toxaemia resolved in 17 of the 21 patients with acute cholecystitis. Acute cholecystitis failed to resolve in three patients; all died within 48 h from overwhelming generalized sepsis. One patient required emergency cholecystectomy for bile peritonitis when the cholecystostomy catheter became dislodged 24 h after placement. The 60-day mortality rate for the acalculous and calculous patient groups was 55 and 20 per cent, respectively. Only three interval cholecystectomies have been performed at a mean follow-up of 19 months. In conclusion, percutaneous cholecystostomy may be the procedure of choice for the management of acute cholecystitis in the very high-risk critically ill patient. If symptoms fail to resolve quickly, ongoing sepsis, cholangitis or gallbladder necrosis should be suspected.

Endoscopic stenting for unresectable pancreatic cancer provides equivalent duration of survival at reduced cost and shorter hospital stay, although subsequent stent changes are necessary. When curative resection is not possible, endoscopic biliary drainage should be considered a good first choice for palliative management.

Medical and surgical emergencies occasionally present as ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (RAAA). To assess benefits of laparotomies and adverse effects of unnecessary operations, the authors reviewed their experience. Thirteen patients, 9 women, 4 men (mean age: 72 years, range: 41-85) underwent emergency laparotomy between 1988 and 1996 for presumed RAAA and were found to have other surgical or medical emergencies.All the patients presented with hypotension, 12 had abdominal or back pain, four had pulsatile abdominal mass. Rupture was not excluded by computed tomography scan in three or by ultrasonography in two patients. Laparotomy disclosed intact abdominal aorta in all, but seven patients had abdominal aortic aneurysm. Of five surgical emergencies, laparotomy was indicated in four: three for ruptured visceral artery aneurysms, one for perforated duodenal ulcer. The fifth patient required thoracotomy for ruptured thoracic aneurysm. Four of eight medical emergencies were myocardial infarctions. One iatrogenic complication required reoperation for bleeding. Mean hospital stay was 18 days; mean hospital charges were $40,771. Seven (54%) early deaths occurred; none were caused directly by the operation.Laparotomy was indicated in one third of deceptive emergencies that present as RAAA. Although mortality, morbidity, and costs were high, iatrogenic surgical complications were rare and deaths were not caused by unnecessary operations.