Maternity care access in the United States is in crisis. The American Congress of Obstetrics and Gynecology projects that by 2030 there will be a nationwide shortage of 9,000 obstetrician-gynecologists (OB/GYNs). Midwives and OB/GYNs have been called upon to address this crisis, yet in underserved areas, family physicians are often providing a majority of this care. Family medicine maternity care, a natural fit for the discipline, has been on sharp decline in recent years for many reasons including difficulties cultivating interdisciplinary relationships, navigating privileging, developing and maintaining adequate volume/competency, and preventing burnout. In 2016 and 2017, workshops were held among family medicine educators with resultant recommendations for essential strategies to support family physician maternity care providers. This article summarizes these strategies, provides guidance, and highlights the role family physicians have in addressing maternity care access for the underserved as well as presenting innovative ideas to train and retain rural family physician maternity care providers. (Fam Med. 2018;50(9):662-71.)

Despite controversy over possible negative effects, prescribing of antidepressants during pregnancy increased between 2002 and 2010. SSRIs represented a smaller proportion of all antidepressants prescribed, and prescribing of paroxetine, likely in response to warnings by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, dropped dramatically.

Drug reviews intended to reduce the rate of polypharmacy among discharged persons aged ≥65 years can be targeted at patients who have 2 or more high-risk diagnoses and at those discharged to receive personal health services either at home or in a convalescence facility.

Collaborative care management (CCM) for depression has been demonstrated to improve clinical outcomes. The impetus for this study was to determine if outpatient utilization patterns would be associated with depression outcomes. The hypothesis was that depression remission would be independently correlated with outpatient utilization at 6 and 12 months after enrollment into CCM. The study was a retrospective chart review analysis of 773 patients enrolled into CCM with 6- and 12-month follow-up data. The data set comprised baseline demographic data, patient intake self-assessment scores (Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ-9], Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, Mood Disorder Questionnaire, and Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test), the number of outpatient visits, and follow-up PHQ-9 scores. To control for individual patient complexity and pattern of usage, the number of outpatient visits for 6 months prior to enrollment also was measured. With a logistic regression model for outpatient visit outlier status as the dependent variable, remission at 6 months (odds ratio [OR] 0.519, CI [confidence interval] 0.349-0.770, P=0.001) and remission at 12 months (OR 0.573, CI 0.354-0.927, P=0.023) were predictive. With this inverse relationship between remission and outlier status, those patients who were not in remission had an OR of 1.928 for outpatient visit outlier status at 6 months after enrollment and an OR of 1.745 at 12 months. Patients who improved clinically to remission while in CCM had decreased odds of outlier status for outpatient utilization at 6 and 12 months when controlling for all other study variables. Improvement in health care outcomes by CCM could translate into decreased outpatient utilization for depressed patients.

Depression symptoms contribute to significant morbidity and health care utilization. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of symptom improvement (to remission) on outpatient clinical visits by depressed primary care patients. This study was a retrospective chart review analysis of 1733 primary care patients enrolled into collaborative care management (CCM) or usual care (UC) with 6-month follow-up data. Baseline data (including demographic information, clinical diagnosis, and depression severity) and 6-month follow-up data (Patient Health Questionnaire scores and the number of outpatient visits utilized) were included in the data set. To control for individual patient complexity and pattern of usage, the number of outpatient visits for 6 months prior to enrollment also was measured as was the presence of medical comorbidities. Multiple logistic regression analysis demonstrated that clinical remission at 6 months was an independent predictor of outpatient visit outlier status (>8 visits) (odds ratio [OR] 0.609, confidence interval (CI) 0.460-0.805, P<0.01) when controlling for all other independent variables including enrollment into CCM or UC. The OR of those patients not in remission at 6 months having outpatient visit outlier status was the inverse of this at 1.643 (CI 1.243-2.173). The most predictive variable for determining increased outpatient visit counts after diagnosis of depression was increased outpatient visits prior to diagnosis (OR 4.892, CI 3.655-6.548, P<0.01). In primary care patients treated for depression, successful treatment to remission at 6 months decreased the likelihood of the patient having more than 8 visits during the 6 months after diagnosis.