SummaryBackgroundEvidence for endoscopic balloon dilation of small intestinal strictures in Crohn's disease (CD) using balloon‐assisted enteroscopy is scarce.AimTo evaluate endoscopic balloon dilation for the treatment of small intestinal CD strictures using balloon‐assisted enteroscopy.MethodsCitations in Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane were systematically reviewed. In a meta‐analysis of 18 studies with 463 patients and 1189 endoscopic balloon dilations, technical success was defined as the ability to dilate a stricture. Individual data were also obtained on 218 patients to identify outcome‐relevant risk factors.ResultsIn the pooled per‐study analysis, technical success rate of endoscopic balloon dilation was 94.9%, resulting in short‐term clinical efficacy in 82.3% of patients. Major complications occurred in 5.3% of patients. During follow‐up, 48.3% of patients reported symptom recurrence, 38.8% were re‐dilated and 27.4% proceeded to surgery. On the per‐patient‐based multivariable analysis, that patients with disease activity in the small intestine had lower short‐term clinical efficacy (odds ratio 0.32; 95% confidence interval 0.14‐0.73, P = 0.007). Patients with concomitant active disease in the small and/or large intestine had an increased risk to proceed toward surgery (hazard ratio 1.85; 95% confidence interval 1.09‐3.13, P = 0.02 and hazard ratio 1.77; 95% confidence interval 1.34‐2.34, P < 0.001).ConclusionsBalloon‐assisted enteroscopy for dilatation of CD‐associated small intestinal strictures has high short‐term technical and clinical efficacy and low complication rates. However, up to two‐thirds of patients need re‐dilation or surgery.

No abstract

Background Crohn disease (CD) affects the small bowel in 80% of patients. Double balloon endoscopy (DBE) provides the potential for direct and extensive mucosal visualization with the potential for diagnostic monitoring and therapeutic intervention. This study aimed to investigate the safety and effectiveness of DBE in small-bowel CD. Methods From our DBE database, patients with CD at the time of index DBE (January 2004-January 2013) were identified. Data collection included demographics, CD phenotype (age at diagnosis, disease location, disease activity), procedural information, adverse events (perforation, pancreatitis, death), therapeutic intervention (stricture dilation), and outcome (escalation or maintenance of existing therapy, referral to surgery). Results A total of 184 DBEs were performed in patients with inflammatory bowel disease over 162 endoscopic sessions. In this cohort, 115 patients had previously diagnosed CD. A diagnosis of CD was made in 22 patients. Of those with known CD, 140 DBEs were performed in 82 patients; DBE findings led to escalation of medical therapy in 26% of patients, maintenance of therapy in 26% of patients, and surgery in 18% of patients. We considered DBE to have failed in 11% (n = 18) of patients. During 46 endoscopic sessions, in 29 patients, 103 strictures were dilated via balloon dilation. Of patients undergoing dilation with clinical follow-up, 19 of 24 (79%) patients were surgery-free during the study period. Overall, there were 2 perforations. Conclusions We found that DBE is a safe and effective procedure in patients with suspected or established CD. Furthermore, patients undergoing dilation of strictures via DBE had an 80% surgery-free rate within the follow-up period.

No abstract

No abstract