Colorectal cancer is one of the most common cancers worldwide. However, it is unclear what influence body mass index (BMI) has on colorectal cancer prognosis. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies to examine the association of BMI with colorectal cancer outcomes. We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE databases from inception to February 2015 and references of identified articles. We selected observational studies that reported all-cause mortality, colorectal cancer-specific mortality, recurrence and disease-free survival according to BMI category. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted to combine estimates. We included 18 observational studies. Obese patients had an increased risk of all-cause mortality [relative risk (RR) 1.14; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.07-1.21], cancer-specific mortality (RR 1.14; 95 % CI 1.05-1.24), recurrence (RR 1.07; 95 % CI 1.02-1.13) and worse disease-free survival (RR 1.07; 95 % CI 1.01-1.13). Underweight patients also had an increased risk of all-cause mortality (RR 1.43; 95 % CI 1.26-1.62), cancer-specific mortality (RR 1.50; 95 % CI 1.20-1.87), recurrence (RR 1.13; 95 % CI 1.05-1.21) and worse disease-free survival (RR 1.27; 95 % CI 1.13-1.43). Overweight patients had no increased risk for any of the outcomes studied. Both obese and underweight patients with colorectal cancer have an increased risk of all-cause mortality, cancer-specific mortality, disease recurrence and worse disease-free survival compared to normal weight patients.

No abstract

While technical and design developments will likely address some shortcomings, the value-based impact of the various approaches will have to be examined in general and on a case-by-case basis. Value as the ratio of quality over cost depends on numerous parameters (disease, complications, patient, efficiency, finances).

Introduction Rectovaginal fistulas are notorious for both their morbidity and their difficulty to treat effectively. A variety of methods for repair has been described; however, there is no consensus on the ideal repair. A better understanding of the anatomical relationship of fistulas to the anal sphincter and detrusor muscles is one of the components necessary to develop an effective treatment plan for repair and preservation of sphincter mechanics. Methods A review of the literature was conducted to determine the types of methods typically used by reconstructive surgeons for repair of rectovaginal fistulas. A critical clinical analysis of our series of 10 patients was performed to determine optimal strategies for and pitfalls of repair in the context of recent reports in hopes of refining surgical techniques. Results Detailed anatomical understanding of the relationship of fistulas to the surrounding sphincter muscles is described. Etiology of the fistula and its anatomical relationship to the surrounding sphincter complex is used to help develop an algorithm for repair. Suprasphincteric fistulas will necessitate a laparotomy for repair, intersphincteric fistulas will often require muscle interposition with recreation of the vaginal and rectal walls, and low/transphincteric fistulas will require local flaps mostly for coverage and repair of the sphincter muscles. Conclusions Complex rectovaginal fistulas are both debilitating for the patient and extremely difficult to manage. Plastic surgeons are often involved in such cases only after previous attempts at repair have failed. The success of surgery in treating these patients with rectovaginal fistulas depends on a variety of factors. Unfortunately, the available literature describing these repairs lacks uniform guidance regarding approach to repair. Herein, we attempt to detail the possible anatomical variations of fistulas in relationship to the sphincter muscles to begin the discussion necessary for the development of an algorithm for repair that considers preservation of sphincter mechanism function.

No abstract