LBA3504 Background: We have reported that neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) with FOLFIRINOX followed by chemoradiotherapy (CRT), surgery, and adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) significantly improved outcomes in patients (pts) with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) compared with pts who received standard CRT, surgery, and ACT. We now report the primary and secondary endpoints with mature follow-up (F/U). Methods: PRODIGE 23 is a phase III randomized clinical trial. Eligible pts had cT3 or cT4, M0 rectal adenocarcinomas <15 cm from the anal verge, age 18-75 years, and WHO PS ≤1. Randomization was stratified by center, T stage, N status, T location, and T extramural spread. Arm A pts received preoperative CRT (50 Gy, 2 Gy/fr; 25 fr + capecitabine), surgery, then ACT for 6 months (mos). Arm B pts received 6 cycles of mFOLFIRINOX, then the same preoperative CRT, surgery and 3 mos of ACT, mFOLFOX6 or capecitabine. From 6/2012 to 6/2017, pts were randomly assigned in Arm A (n=230) and B (n=231) by 35 participating centers. Analysis was performed on intent-to-treat population. For survival outcomes, HR and 95% CI were estimated by a stratified Cox proportional hazard (PH) model. However, we observed non-PH. So we used the restricted mean survival time (RMST) to evaluate the treatment effect (Liang F & al Ann Oncol 2018, Pak K & al JAMA Oncol 2017). Results: With a median F/U of 82.2 mos, death was reported for 55 pts in arm A and 42 in Arm B. All survival endpoints were better for Arm B vs Arm A. The absolute increase in 5-year survival were 7.6% for Disease-Free Survival (DFS), 6.9% for Overall Survival (OS), 9.9% for Metastasis-Free Survival (MFS), and 5.7% for Cancer Specific Survival (CSS) in Arm B compared to Arm A. Survival results at 7 years are presented in the Table. 7-year cumulative incidence of locoregional relapses are 5.3% in arm B vs 8.1% in arm A (p= 0.38). Conclusions: NACT with mFOLFIRINOX followed by CRT, surgery, and ACT significantly improved all outcomes, including OS in pts with LARC vs those who received standard CRT, surgery, and ACT. Clinical trial information: NCT01804790 . [Table: see text]

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and biliary tract cancers (BTC) exhibit a poor prognosis with 5-year overall survival rates around 15%, all stages combined. Most of these primary liver malignancies are metastatic at diagnostic, with only limited therapeutic options, relying mainly on systemic therapies. Treatment modalities are different yet partially overlapping between HCC and BTC. The complex molecular profile of BTC yields to several actionable therapeutic targets, contrary to HCC that remains the field of antiangiogenic drugs in non-molecularly selected patients. Immunotherapy is now validated in the first line in HCC in combination with bevacizumab, while clinical activity of single agent immunotherapy appears limited to a subset of patients in BTC, still poorly characterized, and combinations are currently under investigation. In this review, we provide a critical evaluation and grading of clinical relevance on (i) the main prognostic biomarkers in HCC and BTC, (ii) the main theragnostic biomarkers in both tumors, and lastly (iii) what is recommended in clinical practice.

Main prognostic factors of anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) are tumor size, differentiation, lymph node involvement, and male gender. However, they are insufficient to predict relapses after exclusive radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Fusobacterium nucleatum has been associated with poor prognosis in several digestive cancers. In this study, we assessed the association between intratumoral F. nucleatum load and clinico-pathological features, relapse, and survival in patients with ASCC who underwent abdominoperineal resection (APR) after RT/CRT. We retrospectively analyzed surgical samples from a cohort of 166 patients with ASCC who underwent APR. F. nucleatum 16S rRNA gene sequences were quantified using real-time quantitative PCR. We associated F. nucleatum load with classical clinicopathological features, overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and metastasis-free survival (MFS) using Cox regression univariate and multivariate analyses. Tumors harboring high loads of F. nucleatum (highest tercile) showed longer OS and DFS (median: not reached vs. 50.1 months, p = 0.01, and median: not reached vs. 18.3 months, p = 0.007, respectively). High F. nucleatum load was a predictor of longer OS (HR = 0.55, p = 0.04) and DFS (HR = 0.50, p = 0.02) in multivariate analysis. High F. nucleatum load is an independent favorable prognostic factor in patients with ASCC who underwent APR.

Objectives: Germ cell tumor (GCT) patients with brain metastases (BM) have a poor prognosis and high risk of treatment failure. Optimal therapies for these patients remain controversial. The aim of this study was to report the outcomes of all GCT patients with BM treated with high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) in our French expert center for GCT. Methods:We carried out a retrospective study of 35 GCT patients with BM who were treated from 2003 to 2019 with HDCT, followed by infusions of autologous peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cells. Results:The overall survival at 2 years was 36.9% (95% confidence interval, 19.7-54). The median overall survival was 12 months and the median progression-free survival was 8 months. No variables were associated with better survival in the univariable analysis. Among the 35 patients included in our study, 31 completed HDCT and 4 stopped treatments after mobilization. Eleven patients (11) showed favorable responses (complete, partial, or stable disease) to HDCT and 20 patients died of disease progression (17) or toxicities (3). Among the 11 patients with favorable responses to HDCT, 8 (72.7%) had metachronous BM, mostly isolated. The majority of these patients did not receive local treatment at diagnosis or at relapse.Conclusions: Together, our study reveals that GCT patients can experience long-term survival even in the presence of BM. Metachronous BM can also be cured with HDCT even in the absence of local treatment. Biological and radiologic responses to mobilization could be a predictor of favorable responses to HDCT.