Scientific advances over the last century have generated compelling evidence of the primary and secondary effects of gestational, infant, and childhood conditions. These early environmental influences have the potential not only to impact an individual's health outcomes, such as heart disease, type 2 diabetes, and cancer, but also to confer various protections and risks to that individual's descendants. The immediate and extended ramifications of early environmental exposure bring an understanding of epidemiological impact on disease states and a hope for prevention. This review highlights the contributions of several key population studies and briefly explores specific environmental influences, including nutritional deficiencies, exposure to substances and infections, and adverse childhood experiences. Mechanisms of these influences (e.g. stress and epigenetics) are discussed, as well as possible means of mitigating their negative consequences.
What this paper adds
Substance exposures in utero are associated with epigenetic changes and negative outcomes.
Adverse childhood experiences in early childhood can induce HPA and epigenetic changes.
We examined longitudinal neurodevelopmental outcomes in a series of infants with microcephaly. Retrospective review identified neonatal intensive care unit follow-up clinic patients with a diagnostic code of microcephaly, verified by head circumference less than the fifth precentile (WHO growth curves). Data were collected regarding clinical history and developmental assessments by Capute Scales and gross motor age equivalent. Developmental Quotient (DQ) was age adjusted up until 2 years for preterm infants. Twenty-two infants had microcephaly. At latest follow-up (3-66 months, mean 27.2), 73% had delay (DQ < 70) in ≥1 area of development: gross motor 65% (mean DQ 56.8), visual-motor 59% (mean DQ 62.7), and language 59% (mean DQ 65.9). In this sample, postnatal onset and diagnosis of epilepsy were associated with lower DQs. We conclude that infants with microcephaly are at significant risk for delay across all aspects of development and for long-term disability. Postnatal etiologies of microcephaly and infants with comorbid epilepsy had worse outcomes.
Aims
This study explores disparities in identification of educationally relevant comorbidities and medication prescribing practices for children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and either comprehensive neurodevelopmental evaluations or evaluations limited by insurance to behavior management with medication.
Methods
This study was a retrospective chart review of 5- to 10-year-old children with ADHD diagnosed at the initial evaluation. Data collected included demographics, rates of comorbid conditions, medication management, and educational interventions.
Results
The 2 groups were similar in age, educational supports, and medication management. The group with insurance permitting comprehensive evaluations was more likely to be Caucasian, have higher parental education levels, and have more comorbid conditions identified with academic impact.
Conclusions
School-aged children with ADHD are likely to receive similar educational and medication management despite differences in evaluations. However, our data suggest that children who received comprehensive evaluations had greater identification of comorbid conditions that may influence academic, behavioral, and social outcomes.
Providing advance exposure helped to ensure that trainees arrived with comparable basal knowledge, which served as a foundation for more advanced instruction. This curricular approach may be useful across teaching venues, especially those with multi-level or multi-discipline learners.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.