Action research studies are described which involved nurse teachers, ward sisters and nurse managers in the processes of: nursing practice problem identification and the search for relevant research literature; the evaluation and synthesis of the collected literature; the identification of the need to change practice and the translation of the research synthesis into practice if warranted. The processes engaged in by the groups in each of the three phases in relation to the management of mouth care and preoperative fasting are analysed. The findings suggest that the demands of these processes are beyond the capacity of any one individual nurse and require systematic organizational approaches such as that proposed by quality assurance programmes. The need is emphasized for as much status and resources to be expended on the utilization of existing information as is given to the generation of new knowledge.
This paper describes the use of the Delphi survey technique to develop a professional definition of nursing which is used as a framework for analysing the contribution made to care by learner nurses prior to the introduction of Project 2000. A detailed account is provided of the importance of generating a theoretical nursing perspective to structure the first round of the Delphi survey. The paper goes on to question the validity of developing a consensus about nursing priorities in subsequent rounds of the Delphi survey and argues instead that priorities about nursing care needs can only be determined in the context of practice.
The aspect of the study discussed is part of the analysis of audio-recorded, naturally occurring conversations between symptom control team (SCT) nurses, terminally ill cancer patients and their relatives in their own homes over a 3-month period. Using an ethnographic, extended case-study approach, four 'role formats' were identified as consistently used by the SCT nurses to carry out their work through conversation, one of them being 'friendly and informal'. The SCT nurses explicitly made it known to patients and their relatives that they intended to be 'friendly and informal'. How such a claim was translated into practice, both non-conversationally and through conversation, is the focus of this paper. Being 'friends' and being 'friendly and informal' with patients and clients is frequently advocated in medical and nursing literature, but how this is achieved in practice and the responses of patients seems unstudied. Therefore, the analysis discussed in this paper opens up for critical reflection an unquestioned, taken-for-granted aspect of practice where it is demonstrated how 'friendliness and informality' are conveyed through chatting and how it differs from 'formal' conversations.
Perceptions and expectations reflecting what constitutes a 'good' death that seem to exist in Western societies are explored and compared with those presented by five symptom control team nurses at their home visits to 54 terminally ill cancer patients. These perceptions and expectations are termed 'scripts' for dying and are derived from the nurses', patients' and relatives' audio-recorded conversations over a 3-month period. The elements of the 'scripts' used were identified as: (a) control of physical symptoms, (b) acceptance of cancer and its prognosis, (c) preservation of hope and 'will to live', (d) mobility and 'fighting back', (e) enjoyment of life, (f) a peaceful death at home. How these components are determined from the conversations are presented and the responses of the patients to the nurses' 'scripts' are analysed. The dilemmas created by putting the 'scripts' into action for nurses, patients and relatives are discussed.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.