Motivation Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) are an integral tool for studying the architecture of complex genotype and phenotype relationships. Linear mixed models (LMMs) are commonly used to detect associations between genetic markers and a trait of interest, while at the same time allowing to account for population structure and cryptic relatedness. Assumptions of LMMs include a normal distribution of the residuals and that the genetic markers are independent and identically distributed—both assumptions are often violated in real data. Permutation-based methods can help to overcome some of these limitations and provide more realistic thresholds for the discovery of true associations. Still, in practice, they are rarely implemented due to the high computational complexity. Results We propose permGWAS, an efficient LMM reformulation based on 4D tensors that can provide permutation-based significance thresholds. We show that our method outperforms current state-of-the-art LMMs with respect to runtime and that permutation-based thresholds have lower false discovery rates for skewed phenotypes compared to the commonly used Bonferroni threshold. Furthermore, using permGWAS we re-analyzed more than 500 Arabidopsis thaliana phenotypes with 100 permutations each in less than 8 days on a single GPU. Our re-analyses suggest that applying a permutation-based threshold can improve and refine the interpretation of GWAS results. Availability and implementation permGWAS is open-source and publicly available on GitHub for download: https://github.com/grimmlab/permGWAS. Supplementary information Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Genomic selection is an integral tool for breeders to accurately select plants directly from genotype data leading to faster and more resource-efficient breeding programs. Several prediction methods have been established in the last few years. These range from classical linear mixed models to complex non-linear machine learning approaches, such as Support Vector Regression, and modern deep learning-based architectures. Many of these methods have been extensively evaluated on different crop species with varying outcomes. In this work, our aim is to systematically compare 12 different phenotype prediction models, including basic genomic selection methods to more advanced deep learning-based techniques. More importantly, we assess the performance of these models on simulated phenotype data as well as on real-world data from Arabidopsis thaliana and two breeding datasets from soy and corn. The synthetic phenotypic data allow us to analyze all prediction models and especially the selected markers under controlled and predefined settings. We show that Bayes B and linear regression models with sparsity constraints perform best under different simulation settings with respect to explained variance. Further, we can confirm results from other studies that there is no superiority of more complex neural network-based architectures for phenotype prediction compared to well-established methods. However, on real-world data, for which several prediction models yield comparable results with slight advantages for Elastic Net, this picture is less clear, suggesting that there is a lot of room for future research.