Purpose: After colorectal cancer (CCR) treatment, adequate follow-up is recommended to improve overall survival. We aimed to assess the adherence to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network clinical practice guidelines on post-treatment surveillance for CRC at the National Institute of Medical Sciences and Nutrition Salvador Zubiran in Mexico City, Mexico. Methods: We included patients with stage I-III CRC treated between January 2014 and December 2016. We evaluated adherence to surveillance during the first three years after completion of CRC treatment or until recurrence, whichever came first. We defined adequate compliance with guidelines as ≥2 physician visits annually for three years, ≥2 serum carcinoembryonic antigen blood tests annually for two years, and at least one colonoscopy during the three-year surveillance period. Results: Overall-three-year adherence to surveillance recommendations was 53.8% (n=49). Colonoscopy was the component with the highest adherence with 91.2% (n=83) of the patients, followed by medical visits with 71.4% (n=65) of the patients. During the three-year period of follow-up, 23% (n=21) of patients lost follow-up. Three-year recurrence rate was 6.6% (n=6). In a bivariate analysis, we did not find any significant association between clinical and demographic factors and adherence to surveillance.Conclusions: At our institution, compliance to the guidelines on post-treatment surveillance is higher than the reported at similar centers in other world regions, though there is a decreasing trend in adherence during the study period. More evidence is needed to understand the potential barriers to surveillance and implement strategies to improve compliance to surveillance and the survival of patients.

e18056 Background: Cancer awareness months (CAM) are a health promotion tool that pursues to increase the public knowledge of a specific type of cancer. Awareness campaigns have benefited from the ease of access to the internet and social media. Analysis of internet search data has been used as an indirect tool to determine the information-seeking patterns of people and may reflect the impact of a campaign. We aim to determine national cancer awareness months’ impact on people’s internet search habits focusing on malignancies that have a specific awareness month in Mexico: breast, colorectal and prostate. Methods: We used Google Trends (GT) to obtain search volume indexes (SVIs), a term designed by GT scaled from 0 to 100 based on total searches during a specified period, of malignancies with an awareness month in Mexico from January 2008 to December 2018. Terms were consulted in Spanish: "cáncer de mama" (breast cancer), "cáncer de colon + cáncer colorrectal" (colon + colorectal cancer), "cáncer de próstata" (prostate cancer). We compared mean SVIs from each cancer awareness month to mean SVIs from the rest of the year using two-tailed two-independent sample T-tests. For prostate and colorectal, SVI’s were compared from the year its CAM was nationally instituted. Results: For breast cancer, mean SVI from October, its awareness month was 54.18 vs 12.09 for the rest of the year (p < 0.001). For colorectal cancer, mean SVI from its awareness month March, was 65.0 vs 55.5 for the rest of the year (p = 0.34). For prostate cancer, mean SVI from November, Mexican prostate awareness month, was 72.0 vs 35.52 for the rest of the year (p = 0.44). Conclusions: Google’s search volume for breast cancer was significantly higher in its awareness month compared to the rest of the year, which proves the impact of its CAM on modifying online activity. For more recently instituted CAMs on prostate and colorectal cancer, search volume didn’t change significantly between their CAM and the rest of the year. There are perhaps lessons to be learned from the breast cancer awareness month campaign which might usefully be adapted for the highest incident malignancies in Mexico.

51 Background: Adequate post-treatment surveillance for colorectal cancer (CRC) is recommended by all major societies with the intention to improve overall survival. However, compliance is variable and has not been studied in our country. Our aim was to evaluate the adherence to post-treatment surveillance NCCN guidelines for CRC at our Institution in Mexico City. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed charts from patients with stage I-III CRC who were diagnosed between January 2014 and December 2016. Adherence to surveillance was evaluated for the first 3 years after completion of oncologic treatment or until recurrence, whichever came first. We used an adherence composite definition previously defined by Cooper et al, where adequate compliance with guidelines was considered if patients had ≥2 physician visits per year for 3 years, ≥2 CEA tests per year for 2 years, and at least one colonoscopy in the 3-years surveillance period. Results: We included 90 patients. Mean age at diagnosis was 62 ± 12.5 years, 53% (n=48) were male, 68% (n=62) had colon cancer and 31% (n=28) rectal cancer. According to AJCC7 19% (n=17) were Stage I, 39% (n=35) II, and 42%(n=38) III. Median score for Charslon index at diagnosis was 4 (IQR 3-6). Results of follow-up adherence are presented in Table. Just 12% (n=11) of patients had a PET/CT or any other non-indicated imaging study for surveillance. Recurrence rate at the 3rd year of surveillance was 6.6% (n=6). A bivariate analysis was performed to find clinical and demographic factors associated to adherence and individual components of surveillance, we did not find any significative association. Conclusions: At our institution compliance with follow-up guidelines for CRC is good and higher than reported by other centers, though individual components have a decreasing trend in adherence every year. This could be explained because in our Institution cancer surveillance is performed by a medical oncologist. The main limitation of our study is that it involves an individual reference center in Mexico; thus, extrapolating data may not be feasible. [Table: see text]