The aim of the study was to determine the causes and prognostic implications of antimicrobial treatment failures in patients with nonresponding and progressive life-threatening, community-acquired pneumonia. Forty-nine patients hospitalized with a presumptive diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia during a 16-mo period, failure to respond to antimicrobial treatment, and documented repeated microbial investigation >/= 72 h after initiation of in-hospital antimicrobial treatment were recorded. A definite etiology of treatment failure could be established in 32 of 49 (65%) patients, and nine additional patients (18%) had a probable etiology. Treatment failures were mainly infectious in origin and included primary, persistent, and nosocomial infections (n = 10 [19%], 13 [24%], and 11 [20%] of causes, respectively). Definite but not probable persistent infections were mostly due to microbial resistance to the administered initial empiric antimicrobial treatment. Nosocomial infections were particularly frequent in patients with progressive pneumonia. Definite persistent infections and nosocomial infections had the highest associated mortality rates (75 and 88%, respectively). Nosocomial pneumonia was the only cause of treatment failure independently associated with death in multivariate analysis (RR, 16.7; 95% CI, 1.4 to 194.9; p = 0.03). We conclude that the detection of microbial resistance and the diagnosis of nosocomial pneumonia are the two major challenges in hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia who do not respond to initial antimicrobial treatment. In order to establish these potentially life-threatening etiologies, a regular microbial reinvestigation seems mandatory for all patients presenting with antimicrobial treatment failures.
Noninvasive and invasive diagnostic techniques have been shown to achieve comparable performances in the evaluation of suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). We studied the impact of both approaches on outcome in a prospective, open, and randomized study in three intensive care units (ICUs) of a 1,000-bed tertiary care university hospital. Patients with suspected VAP were randomly assigned to noninvasive (Group 1) versus invasive (Group 2) investigation (tracheobronchial aspirates [TBAS] versus bronchoscopically retrieved protected specimen brush [PSB] and bronchoalveolar lavage [BAL]. Samples were cultured quantitatively, and BAL fluid (BALF) was examined for intracellular organisms (ICO) additionally. Initial empiric antimicrobial treatment was administered following the guidelines of the American Thoracic Society (ATS) and adjusted according to culture results (and ICO counts in Group 2). Outcome variables included length of ICU stay and mechanical ventilation as well as mortality. Overall, 76 patients (39 noninvasive, 37 invasive) were investigated. VAP was microbiologically confirmed in 23 of 39 (59%) and 23 of 37 (62%) (p = 0.78). There were no differences with regard to the frequencies of community-acquired and potentially drug-resistant microorganisms (PDRM). Antimicrobial treatment was changed in seven patients (18%) of Group 1 and 10 patients (27%) of Group 2 because of etiologic findings (including five of 17 with ICO = 2% (p = not significant [NS]). Length of ICU stay and mechanical ventilation were also not significantly different in both groups. Crude 30-d mortality was 31 of 76 (41%), and 18 of 39 (46%) in Group 1 and 14 of 37 (38%) in Group 2 (p = 0.46). Adjusted mortality was 16% versus 11% (p = 0.53), and mortality of microbiologically confirmed pneumonia 10 of 23 (44%) in both groups (p = 1.0). We conclude that the outcome of VAP was not influenced by the techniques used for microbial investigation.
Artículo de publicación ISIBackground Adult community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a relevant worldwide cause of morbidity and mortality, however the aetiology often remains uncertain and the therapy is empirical. We applied conventional and molecular diagnostics to identify viruses and atypical bacteria associated with CAP in Chile. Methods We used sputum and blood cultures, IgG/IgM serology and molecular diagnostic techniques (PCR, reverse transcriptase PCR) for detection of classical and atypical bacteria (Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Chlamydia pneumoniae, Legionella pneumoniae) and respiratory viruses (adenovirus, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), human metapneumovirus, influenza virus, parainfluenzavirus, rhinovirus, coronavirus) in adults >18 years old presenting with CAP in Santiago from February 2005 to September 2007. Severity was qualified at admission by Fine’s pneumonia severity index. Results Overall detection in 356 enrolled adults were 92 (26%) cases of a single bacterial pathogen, 80 (22%) cases of a single viral pathogen, 60 (17%) cases with mixed bacterial and viral infection and 124 (35%) cases with no identified pathogen. Streptococcus pneumoniae and RSV were the most common bacterial and viral pathogens identified. Infectious agent detection by PCR provided greater sensitivity than conventional techniques. To our surprise, no relationship was observed between clinical severity and sole or coinfections. Conclusions The use of molecular diagnostics expanded the detection of viruses and atypical bacteria in adults with CAP, as unique or coinfections. Clinical severity and outcome were independent of the aetiological agents detected
The aim of the study was to determine the incidence of and risk factors for drug resistance of Streptococcus pneumoniae, and its impact on the outcome among hospitalized patients of pneumococcal pneumonia acquired in the community. Consecutive patients with culture-proven pneumococcal pneumonia were prospectively studied with regard to the incidence of pneumococcal drug resistance, potential risk factors, and in-hospital outcome variables. A total of 101 patients were studied. Drug resistance to penicillin, cephalosporin, or a macrolide drug was found in pneumococci from 52 of the 101 (52%) patients; 49% of these isolates were resistant to penicillin (16% intermediate resistance, 33% high resistance), 31% to cephalosporin (22% intermediate and 9% high resistance), and 27% to a macrolide drug. In immunocompetent patients, age > 65 yr was significantly associated with resistance to cephalosporin (odds ratio [OR]: 5.0; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.3 to 18.8, p = 0. 01), and with the presence of > 2 comorbidities with resistance to penicillin (OR: 4.7; 95% CI: 1.2 to 19.1; p < 0.05). In immunosuppressed patients, bacteremia was inversely associated with resistance to penicillin and cephalosporin (OR: 0.04; 95% CI: 0.003 to 0.45; p < 0.005; and OR: 0.46; 95% CI: 0.23 to 0.93; p < 0.05, respectively). Length of hospital stay, severity of pneumonia, and complications were not significantly affected by drug resistance. Mortality was 15% in patients with any drug resistance, as compared with 6% in those without resistance. However, any drug resistance was not significantly associated with death (relative risk [RR]: 2. 5; 95% CI: 0.7 to 8.9; p = 0.14). Moreover, attributable mortality in the presence of discordant antimicrobial treatment was 12%, as compared with 10% (RR: 1.2; 95% CI: 0.3 to 5.3; p = 0.67) in the absence of such treatment. We conclude that the incidence of drug-resistant pneumococci was high. Risk factors for drug resistance included advanced age, comorbidity, and (inversely) bacteremia. Outcome was not significantly affected by drug resistance.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.