No abstract

BackgroundStudies evaluating nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) to prevent nicotine withdrawal symptoms in ICU patients have yielded conflicting results. We performed a randomised controlled double-blind pilot study to assess the safety and efficacy of NRT in critically ill patients. Mechanically ventilated patients admitted to two medical–surgical intensive care units and smoking more than 10 cigarettes per day before ICU admission were enrolled in this study. Participants were randomised to transdermal NRT (14 or 21 mg per day) or placebo until ICU discharge or day 30. Smoking status was confirmed by the biomarkers serum cotinine and urinary NNAL. The primary endpoint was 30-day mortality. Among secondary endpoints and post hoc endpoints, 90-day mortality, safety, time spent without delirium, sedation and coma, and patient destination at day 30 were addressed.ResultsWe enrolled 47 patients. No differences were found between NRT and control group patients concerning 30-day mortality (9.5 vs. 7.7%, p = 0.84) and 90-day mortality (14.3 vs. 19.2%, p = 0.67). The number of serious adverse events was comparable between groups (NRT: 4, control: 11, p = 0.13). At day 20, average time alive without delirium, sedation and coma was 16.6 days among NRT patients versus 12.6 days among control patients (p = 0.03). At day 30, more NRT group patients were discharged from the ICU or hospital compared with controls (p = 0.03).ConclusionsNRT did not affect mortality or the number of (serious) adverse events compared with placebo. Time alive without delirium, sedation and coma at day 20 in NRT patients was longer than in control patients. An adequately powered randomised controlled trial to further study safety and efficacy of NRT in ICU patients seems feasible and is warranted.Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01362959, registered 1 June 2011Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s13613-018-0399-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Background Various metrics of hospital antibiotic use might assist in guiding antimicrobial stewardship (AMS). Objectives To compare patient outcomes in association with three methods to measure and feedback information on hospital antibiotic use when used in developing an AMS intervention. Methods Three methods were randomly allocated to 42 clusters from 21 Dutch hospitals: (1) feedback on quantity of antibiotic use [DDD, days-of-therapy (DOT) from hospital pharmacy data], versus feedback on (2) validated, or (3) non-validated quality indicators from point prevalence studies. Using this feedback together with an implementation tool, stewardship teams systematically developed and performed improvement strategies. The hospital length of stay (LOS) was the primary outcome and secondary outcomes included DOT, ICU stay and hospital mortality. Data were collected before (February–May 2015) and after (February–May 2017) the intervention period. Results The geometric mean hospital LOS decreased from 9.5 days (95% CI 8.9–10.1, 4245 patients) at baseline to 9.0 days (95% CI 8.5–9.6, 4195 patients) after intervention (P < 0.001). No differences in effect on LOS or secondary outcomes were found between methods. Feedback on quality of antibiotic use was used more often to identify improvement targets and was preferred over feedback on quantity of use. Consistent use of the implementation tool seemed to increase effectiveness of the AMS intervention. Conclusions The decrease in LOS versus baseline likely reflects improvement in the quality of antibiotic use with the stewardship intervention. While the outcomes with the three methods were otherwise similar, stewardship teams preferred data on the quality over the quantity of antibiotic use.

Aims The aim of this study was to investigate the population pharmacokinetics (PK) of clonidine in intensive care unit (ICU) patients in order to develop a dosing regimen for sedation. Methods We included 24 adult mechanically ventilated, sedated patients from a mixed medical and surgical ICU. Intravenous clonidine was added to standard sedation in doses of 600, 1200 or 1800 μg/d. Within each treatment group, 4 patients received a loading dose of half the daily dose administered in 4 hours. Patients gave an average of 12 samples per individual. In total, 286 samples were available for analysis. Model development was conducted with NONMEM and various covariates were tested. After modelling, doses to achieve a target steady‐state plasma concentration of >1.5 μg/L were explored using stochastic Monte Carlo simulations for 1000 virtual patients. Results A 2‐compartment model was the best fit for the concentration‐time data. Clearance (CL) increased linearly with 0.213%/h; using allometric scaling, body weight was a significant covariate on the central volume of distribution (V1). Population PK parameters were: CL 17.1 (L/h), V1 124 (L/70 kg), intercompartmental CL 83.7 (L/h), and peripheral volume of distribution 178 (L), with 33.3% CV interindividual variability on CL and 66.8% CV interindividual variability on V1. Simulations revealed that a maintenance dose of 1200 μg/d provides target sedation concentrations of >1.5 μg/L in 95% of the patients. Conclusion A population PK model for clonidine was developed in an adult ICU. A dosing regimen of 1200 μg/d provided a target sedation concentration of >1.5 μg/L.

Polystyrene sulfonate and sevelamer are able to bind quetiapine. Healthcare professionals should be aware of this potential drug-drug interaction as this could lead to antipsychotic treatment failure.