RNA interference (RNAi) is a natural process of posttranscriptional gene regulation that has raised a lot of attention culminating with the Nobel Prize in Medicine in 2006. RNAi‐based therapeutics have been tested in experimental transplantation to reduce ischemia/reperfusion injury (IRI) with success. Modulation of genes of the innate immune system, as well as apoptotic genes, and those involved in the nuclear factor kappa B pathways can reduce liver injury in rodent liver pedicle clamping and transplantation models of IRI. However, in vivo use of RNAi faces limitations regarding the method of administration, uptake, selectivity, and stability. Machine perfusion preservation, a more recent alternative approach for liver preservation showing superior results to static cold preservation, could be used as a platform for gene interference therapeutics. Our group was the first to demonstrate uptake of small interfering RNA (siRNA) during liver machine preservation under both normothermic and hypothermic perfusion. Administering siRNA in the perfusion solution during ex vivo machine preservation has several advantages, including more efficient delivery, lower doses and cost‐saving, and none/fewer side effects to other organs. Recently, the first RNAi drug was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for clinical use, opening a new avenue for new drugs with different clinical applications. RNAi has the potential to have transformational therapeutic applications in several areas of medicine including transplantation. We believe that machine preservation offers great potential to be the ideal delivery method of siRNA to the liver graft, and future studies should be initiated to improve the clinical applicability of RNAi in solid organ transplantation.

BackgroundIt remains controversial if arterial perfusion in addition to portal vein perfusion during machine preservation improves liver graft quality. Comparative studies using both techniques are lacking. We studied the impact of using single or dual machine perfusion of donation after circulatory death rat livers. In addition, we analyzed the effect of pulsatile versus continuous arterial flow.MethodsDonation after circulatory death rat livers (n = 18) were preserved by 6 hours cold storage, followed by 1 hour subnormothermic machine perfusion (20°C, pressure of 40/5 mm Hg) and 2 hours ex vivo warm reperfusion (37°C, pressure of 80/11 mm Hg, 9% whole blood). Machine preservation was either through single portal vein perfusion (SP), dual pulsatile (DPP), or dual continuous perfusion (DCP) of the portal vein and hepatic artery. Hydrodynamics, liver function tests, histopathology, and expression of endothelial specific genes were assessed during 2 hours warm reperfusion.ResultsAt the end of reperfusion, arterial flow in DPP livers tended to be higher compared to DCP and SP grafts. However, this difference was not significant nor was better flow associated with better outcome. No differences in bile production or alanine aminotransferase levels were observed. SP livers had significantly lower lactate compared to DCP, but not DPP livers. Levels of Caspase-3 and tumor necrosis factor-α were similar between the groups. Expression of endothelial genes Krüppel-like-factor 2 and endothelial nitric oxide synthase tended to be higher in dual perfused livers, but no histological evidence of better preservation of the biliary endothelium or vasculature of the hepatic artery was observed.ConclusionsThis study shows comparable outcomes after using a dual or single perfusion approach during end-ischemic subnormothermic liver machine preservation.