BACKGROUND A new miniature high-resolution pocket-mobile echocardiographic (PME) device has become available to clinicians, but there are no data available comparing this technology with standard transthoracic echo (TTE) examination. OBJECTIVE To assess the potential validity of PME imaging as a quick assessment of cardiovascular disease by direct comparison to standard TTE. DESIGN Ultrasonographers attempted to acquire seven standard echocardiography views with the PME prior to performing comprehensive standard TTEs. In blinded fashion, images from the two modalities were compared by two experienced echocardiographers and two cardiology fellows. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE This work was funded in part by Scripps Health and the NIH UL1 RR025774 (Scripps Translational Science Institute, Clinical and Translational Science Award). SETTING Scripps Clinic/Green Hospital PATIENTS 97 consecutive unselected patients MEASUREMENTS Comparisons were made in regards to ejection fraction (EF), segmental wall motion abnormalities (WMA), left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD), inferior vena cava (IVC) size, aortic and mitral valve pathology, and pericardial effusion. RESULTS PME images were adequate for interpretation of EF in 95% of the studies, LVEDD 95%, mitral valve 90%, WMA 83%, aortic valve 83%, and IVC 75%. Compared to standard TTE, PME interpretation by attendings and fellows had an accuracy of 97% and 93% for EF, respectively. Likewise, accuracy for WMA was 90% and 87% ; LVEDD 94% and 91%; aortic stenosis 97% and 95%; mitral abnormality 88% and 82%; and IVC size 81% and 74%. LIMITATIONS As this was a validation study of imaging alone, further evaluation with clinician image acquisition is needed. CONCLUSIONS PME images obtained rapidly by skilled ultrasonographers provide excellent visualization in the vast majority of patients and correlate well with standard, comprehensive TTE. Such validation needs to be extended to untrained clinicians in larger and diverse patient populations before broad dissemination of this technology can be recommended.

Statins (3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors) have been shown to be effective at lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and decreasing the risk of coronary heart disease. Although safe and well tolerated by most patients, statins have also been associated with muscle-related adverse events. This article reviews statin-associated myotoxicity to clarify the definitions of muscle-related adverse events and discusses their incidences in major statin trials, case reports, and review articles through January 2006. Milder complaints (ie, myalgia) are reported by approximately 5% to 7% of patients who take statins. More severe myotoxicity, namely rhabdomyolysis, is extremely rare for all statins save cerivastatin, and most recent estimates of its incidence are between 0.44 and 0.54 cases per 10 000 person-years. The mechanism of statin-associated myotoxicity has not been satisfactorily defined and is likely due to multiple factors, including membrane instability, mitochondrial dysfunction, and defects in myocyte duplication.

Background: Amino-terminal proÀB-type natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP) is closely associated with prognosis in acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). As a result, there has been great interest measuring it during the course of treatment. The prognostic implications in both short-term and follow-up changes in NTproBNP need further clarification. Methods: Baseline, 48À72 hour, and 30-day NTproBNP levels were measured in 795 subjects in the ASCEND-HF trial. Multivariable logistic and Cox-proportional hazards models were used to test the association between static, relative, and absolute changes in NTproBNP with outcomes during and after ADHF. Results: The median NTproBNP at baseline was 5773 (2981À11,579) pg/mL; at 48À72 hours was 3036 (1191À6479) pg/mL; and at 30 days was 2914 (1364À6667) pg/mL. Absolute changes in NTproBNP by 48À72 hours were not associated with 30-day heart failure rehospitalization or mortality (P = .065), relative changes in NTproBNP were nominally associated (P = .046). In contrast, both absolute and relative changes in NTproBNP from baseline to 48À72 hours and to 30 days were closely associated with 180-day mortality (P < .02 for all) with increased discrimination compared to the multivariable models with baseline NTproBNP (P <.05 for models with relative and absolute change at both time points). Conclusions: Although the degree of absolute change in NTproBNP was dependent on baseline levels, both short-term absolute and relative changes in NTproBNP were independently and incrementally associated with long-term clinical outcomes. Changes in NTproBNP levels at 30-days were particularly well associated with long-term clinical outcomes.

No abstract

Heart transplantation remains the gold standard treatment for advanced heart failure, although its use is limited by donor organ availability. To ensure that the rare resource of a donor heart is allocated appropriately, the evaluation of the heart transplant candidates includes extensive medical and psychosocial assessments. These psychosocial factors are critically important to understand pre-heart transplant because it is known that psychosocial evaluation and psychosocial comorbidities have a strong association with post-heart transplant outcomes. The critical factors to assess are psychological functioning, adherence to medical recommendations, and social support. These factors are likely inter-related and have been shown to have an effect on the health-related quality of life and overall survival. Recently, new tools have been developed to standardize the evaluation process. In this review, we will discuss the tools available to assess psychosocial factors in the transplant candidate and discuss the role these factors have on post-heart transplant outcomes.