Due to its low cost and easy use, the use of material extrusion (MEX) as an additive manufacturing (AM) technology has increased rapidly in recent years. However, this process mainly involves the processing of new plastics. Combining the MEX process with polyethylene terephthalate (PET), which offers a high potential for mechanical and chemical recyclability, opens up a broad spectrum of reutilization possibilities. Turning used PET bottles into printable filament for MEX is not only a recycling option, but also an attractive upcycling scenario that can lead to the production of complex, functional parts. This work analyzes the process of extruding recycled PET bottle flakes into a filament, taking different extrusion screws and extrusion parameters into account. The filament is subsequently processed with MEX into tensile tests. An accompanying thermal, rheological and mechanical characterization of the recycled resin is performed to offer a comparison to the virgin material and a commercially available glycol modified polyethylene terephthalate (PETG) filament. The results show the importance of adequate drying parameters prior to the extrusion and the sensitivity of the material to moisture, leading to degradation. The recycled material is more prone to degradation and presents lower viscosities. Mechanical tests display a higher tensile strength of the recycled and virgin resin in comparison to the PETG. The extrusion of the used PET into a filament and the subsequent printing with the MEX process offers a viable recycling process for the discarded material.
Validation is an important step after a calibration of models in order to assess their quality. In this work, new test equipment is presented that provides a comprehensive database for validation of material models for numerical analyses using FE simulation in sheet metal forming: the MUC-Test (acronym for Material Under Control). The introduced validation strategy is based on a comparison of experimental results with a numerical representation of the MUC-Test in terms of punch force and major and minor strain. The data comparison approach uses a full-field comparison over a wide range of punch stroke and thus considers the hardening behavior of the models. Extensive parameter studies are performed to investigate numerical, process and material model parameters regarding their influence on the test results. The presented validation method is applied to three materials of different material classes: The microalloyed steel HC340LA, the dual-phase steel DP590HD and the aluminum alloy AA5754. Furthermore, different material models based on the same database are compared for the DP590HD, showing the potential to identify suitable material models for specific requirements. Finally, equivalent material models based on different calibration strategies are compared. In conclusion, it is shown that the MUC-Test can be used to evaluate and compare different material models in terms of their ability to represent real material behavior in an effective and efficient way.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.