Compatible plant–virus interactions result in dramatic changes of the plant transcriptome and morphogenesis, and are often associated with rapid alterations in plant hormone homeostasis and signalling. Auxin controls many aspects of plant organogenesis, development, and growth; therefore, plants can rapidly perceive and respond to changes in the cellular auxin levels. Auxin signalling is a tightly controlled process and, hence, is highly vulnerable to changes in the mRNA and protein levels of its components. There are several core nuclear components of auxin signalling. In the nucleus, the interaction of auxin response factors (ARFs) and auxin/indole acetic acid (Aux/IAA) proteins is essential for the control of auxin‐regulated pathways. Aux/IAA proteins are negative regulators, whereas ARFs are positive regulators of the auxin response. The interplay between both is essential for the transcriptional regulation of auxin‐responsive genes, which primarily regulate developmental processes but also modulate the plant immune system. Recent studies suggest that plant viruses belonging to different families have developed various strategies to disrupt auxin signalling, namely by (a) changing the subcellular localization of Aux/IAAs, (b) preventing degradation of Aux/IAAs by stabilization, or (c) inhibiting the transcriptional activity of ARFs. These interactions perturb auxin signalling and experimental evidence from various studies highlights their importance for virus replication, systemic movement, interaction with vectors for efficient transmission, and symptom development. In this microreview, we summarize and discuss the current knowledge on the interaction of plant viruses with auxin signalling components of their hosts.

The A-type of beet necrotic yellow vein virus (BNYVV) is widely distributed in Europe and is one of the major virus types causing rhizomania disease in sugar beet. The closely related P-type is mainly limited to a small region in France (Pithiviers). Both virus types possess four RNAs (RNA1–4), but the P-type harbours an additional fifth RNA species (RNA5). The P-type is associated with stronger disease symptoms and resistance-breaking of Rz1, one of the two resistance genes which are used to control BNYVV infection. These characteristics are presumably due to the presence of RNA5, but experimental evidence for this is lacking. We generated the first infectious cDNA clone of BNYVV P-type to study its pathogenicity in sugar beet in comparison to a previously developed A-type clone. Using this tool, we confirmed the pathogenicity of the P-type clone in the experimental host Nicotiana benthamiana and two Beta species, B. macrocarpa and B. vulgaris. Independent of RNA5, both the A- and the P-type accumulated in lateral roots and reduced the taproot weight of a susceptible sugar beet genotype to a similar extent. In contrast, only the P-type clone was able to accumulate a virus titre in an Rz1-resistant variety whereas the A-type clone failed to infect this variety. The efficiency of the P-type to overcome Rz1 resistance was strongly associated with the presence of RNA5. Only a double resistant variety, harbouring Rz1 and Rz2, prevented an infection with the P-type. Reassortment experiments between the P- and A-type clones demonstrated that both virus types can exchange whole RNA components without losing the ability to replicate and to move systemically in sugar beet. Although our study highlights the close evolutionary relationship between the two virus types, we were able to demonstrate distinct pathogenicity properties that are attributed to the presence of RNA5 in the P-type.

No abstract