The main goals for urologists during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic are to prevent their patients from getting COVID-19, protect themselves as health care professionals, and deliver optimal urology care [1]. While prioritisation strategies are being proposed [2,3], further measures are warranted for multifaceted action plans towards optimal perpetuation of urology care during the pandemic [4]. Urological telemedicine can lead to (1) fewer patient contacts, (2) lower infection rates among the staff, and (3) continuation of urological care by quarantined urologists [5]. However, the proportion of patients eligible for telemedicine, their wish to use telemedicine, and their demographic risk profile for acquiring a severe pandemic infection are unknown. In this context, we tested the potential of telemedicine in urology. We evaluated patients' eligibility for telemedicine according to the physician and examined the patients' perspective by evaluating their willingness for telemedicine.

The present study revealed the individual learning curve of a novice in MRI/TRUS fusion biopsy and demonstrated significant learning progress regarding targeted biopsy detection quotient and biopsy time.

Purpose Open simple prostatectomy (OSP) is a standard surgical technique for patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia with prostate size larger than 80 ml. As a minimally invasive approach, robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) emerged as a feasible surgical alternative. Currently, there are no definite recommendations for the standard use of RASP. Therefore, we aimed at investigating various clinical outcomes comparing RASP with OSP. Methods In this retrospective single-center study, we evaluated clinical data from 103 RASP and 31 OSP patients. Both cohorts were compared regarding different clinical characteristics with and without propensity score matching. To detect independent predictive factors for clinical outcomes, multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed. Results Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy patients demonstrated a lower estimated blood loss and need for postoperative blood transfusions as well as less postoperative complications. OSP had a shorter operative time (125 min vs. 182 min) longer hospital stay (11 days vs. 9 days) and longer time to catheter removal (8 days vs. 6 days). In the multivariate analysis, RASP was identified as an independent predictor for longer operative time, lower estimated blood loss, shorter length of hospital stay, shorter time to catheter removal, less postoperative complications and blood transfusions. Conclusion Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy is a safe alternative to OSP with less perioperative and postoperative morbidity. Whether OSP (shorter operative time) or RASP (shorter length of hospital stay) has a more favorable economic impact depends on the particular conditions of different health care systems. Further prospective comparative research is warranted to define the value of RASP in the current surgical management of benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Objectives While the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic captures healthcare resources worldwide, data on the impact of prioritization strategies in urology during pandemic are absent. We aimed to quantitatively assess the global change in surgical and oncological clinical practice in the early COVID-19 pandemic. Methods In this cross-sectional observational study, we designed a 12-item online survey on the global effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on clinical practice in urology. Demographic survey data, change of clinical practice, current performance of procedures, and current commencement of treatment for 5 conditions in medical urological oncology were evaluated. Results 235 urologists from 44 countries responded. Out of them, 93% indicated a change of clinical practice due to COVID-19. In a 4-tiered surgery down-escalation scheme, 44% reported to make first cancellations, 23% secondary cancellations, 20% last cancellations and 13% emergency cases only. Oncological surgeries had low cancellation rates (%): transurethral resection of bladder tumor (27%), radical cystectomy (21-24%), nephroureterectomy (21%), radical nephrectomy (18%), and radical orchiectomy (8%). (Neo)adjuvant/palliative treatment is currently not started by more than half of the urologists. COVID-19 high-risk-countries had higher total cancellation rates for non-oncological procedures (78% vs. 68%, p = 0.01) and were performing oncological treatment for metastatic diseases at a lower rate (35% vs. 48%, p = 0.02). Conclusion The COVID-19 pandemic has affected clinical practice of 93% of urologists worldwide. The impact of implementing surgical prioritization protocols with moderate cancellation rates for oncological surgeries and delay or reduction in (neo)adjuvant/palliative treatment will have to be evaluated after the pandemic.

Despite increasing options for treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer, development of drug resistance is inevitable. The glucocorticoid receptor (GR) is a prime suspect for acquired therapy resistance, as prostate cancer (PCa) cells are able to increase GR signaling during anti-androgen therapy and thereby circumvent androgen receptor (AR)-blockade and cell death. As standard AR-directed therapies fail to block the GR and GR inhibitors might result in intolerable side effects, the identification of GR signature genes, which are better suited for a targeted approach, is of clinical importance. Therefore, the specific epithelial and stromal GR signature was determined in cancer-associated fibroblasts as well as in abiraterone and enzalutamide-resistant cells after glucocorticoid (GC) treatment. Microarray and ChIP analysis identified MAO-A as a directly up-regulated mutual epithelial and stromal GR target, which is induced after GC treatment and during PCa progression. Elevated MAO-A levels were confirmed in in vitro cell models, in primary tissue cultures after GC treatment, and in patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with GCs. MAO-A expression correlates with GR/AR activity as well as with a reduced progression-free survival. Pharmacological MAO-A inhibition combined with 2nd generation AR signaling inhibitors or chemotherapeutics results in impaired growth of androgen-dependent, androgen-independent, and long-term anti-androgen-treated cells. In summary, these findings demonstrate that targeting MAO-A represents an innovative therapeutic strategy to synergistically block GR and AR dependent PCa cell growth and thereby overcome therapy resistance.