After spinal cord injury (SCI), the destruction of spinal parenchyma causes permanent deficits in motor functions, which correlates with the severity and location of the lesion. Despite being disconnected from their targets, most cortical motor neurons survive the acute phase of SCI, and these neurons can therefore be a resource for functional recovery, provided that they are properly reconnected and retuned to a physiological state. However, inappropriate re-integration of cortical neurons or aberrant activity of corticospinal networks may worsen the long-term outcomes of SCI. In this review, we revisit recent studies addressing the relation between cortical disinhibition and functional recovery after SCI. Evidence suggests that cortical disinhibition can be either beneficial or detrimental in a context-dependent manner. A careful examination of clinical data helps to resolve apparent paradoxes and explain the heterogeneity of treatment outcomes. Additionally, evidence gained from SCI animal models indicates probable mechanisms mediating cortical disinhibition. Understanding the mechanisms and dynamics of cortical disinhibition is a prerequisite to improve current interventions through targeted pharmacological and/or rehabilitative interventions following SCI.

A spinal cord injury (SCI) damages the axonal projections of neurons residing in the neocortex. This axotomy changes cortical excitability and results in dysfunctional activity and output of infragranular cortical layers. Thus, addressing cortical pathophysiology after SCI will be instrumental in promoting recovery. However, the cellular and molecular mechanisms of cortical dysfunction after SCI are poorly resolved. In this study, we determined that the principal neurons of the primary motor cortex layer V (M1LV), those suffering from axotomy upon SCI, become hyperexcitable following injury. Therefore, we questioned the role of hyperpolarization cyclic nucleotide gated channels (HCN channels) in this context. Patch clamp experiments on axotomized M1LV neurons and acute pharmacological manipulation of HCN channels allowed us to resolve a dysfunctional mechanism controlling intrinsic neuronal excitability one week after SCI. Some axotomized M1LV neurons became excessively depolarized. In those cells, the HCN channels were less active and less relevant to control neuronal excitability because the membrane potential exceeded the window of HCN channel activation. Care should be taken when manipulating HCN channels pharmacologically after SCI. Even though the dysfunction of HCN channels partakes in the pathophysiology of axotomized M1LV neurons, their dysfunctional contribution varies remarkably between neurons and combines with other pathophysiological mechanisms.