Macromolecular complexes composed of proteins or proteins and nucleic acids rather than individual macromolecules mediate many cellular activities. Maintenance of these activities is essential for cell viability and requires the coordinated production of the individual complex components as well as their faithful incorporation into functional entities. Failure of complex assembly may have fatal consequences and can cause severe diseases. While many macromolecular complexes can form spontaneously in vitro, they often require aid from assembly factors including assembly chaperones in the crowded cellular environment. The assembly of RNA protein complexes implicated in the maturation of pre-mRNAs (termed UsnRNPs) has proven to be a paradigm to understand the action of assembly factors and chaperones. UsnRNPs are assembled by factors united in protein arginine methyltransferase 5 (PRMT5)- and survival motor neuron (SMN)-complexes, which act sequentially in the UsnRNP production line. While the PRMT5-complex pre-arranges specific sets of proteins into stable intermediates, the SMN complex displaces assembly factors from these intermediates and unites them with UsnRNA to form the assembled RNP. Despite advanced mechanistic understanding of UsnRNP assembly, our knowledge of regulatory features of this essential and ubiquitous cellular function remains remarkably incomplete. One may argue that the process operates as a default biosynthesis pathway and does not require sophisticated regulatory cues. Simple theoretical considerations and a number of experimental data, however, indicate that regulation of UsnRNP assembly most likely happens at multiple levels. This review will not only summarize how individual components of this assembly line act mechanistically but also why, how, and when the UsnRNP workflow might be regulated by means of posttranslational modification in response to cellular signaling cues.

RNA editing processes are strikingly different in animals and plants. Up to thousands of specific cytidines are converted into uridines in plant chloroplasts and mitochondria whereas up to millions of adenosines are converted into inosines in animal nucleo-cytosolic RNAs. It is unknown whether these two different RNA editing machineries are mutually incompatible. RNA-binding pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) proteins are the key factors of plant organelle cytidine-to-uridine RNA editing. The complete absence of PPR mediated editing of cytosolic RNAs might be due to a yet unknown barrier that prevents its activity in the cytosol. Here, we transferred two plant mitochondrial PPR-type editing factors into human cell lines to explore whether they could operate in the nucleo-cytosolic environment. PPR56 and PPR65 not only faithfully edited their native, co-transcribed targets but also different sets of off-targets in the human background transcriptome. More than 900 of such off-targets with editing efficiencies up to 91%, largely explained by known PPR-RNA binding properties, were identified for PPR56. Engineering two crucial amino acid positions in its PPR array led to predictable shifts in target recognition. We conclude that plant PPR editing factors can operate in the entirely different genetic environment of the human nucleo-cytosol and can be intentionally re-engineered towards new targets.

PTPN23 encodes a ubiquitously expressed non-receptor type, catalytically inactive protein-tyrosine phosphatase found in all cells including neurons. Recently, we have identified PTPN23 in a cellular screen for the systematic identification of novel regulators of survival motor neuron (SMN) function in the assembly of splicing factors (Uridine-rich small nuclear ribonucleoproteins, UsnRNPs). Based on three families, recessive PTPN23 variants have been associated with human disease tentatively, without functional studies. Here, we describe a pediatric proband with severe developmental delay, epilepsy, cortical blindness, hypomyelination and brain atrophy on MRI. Whole exome sequencing and family study showed two novel PTPN23 variants, c.1902C>G (p.(Asn634Lys)) and c.2974delC (p.(Leu992Tyrfs*168)), in compound heterozygous state, which are predicted in silico to be damaging. When studying patient's fibroblasts we found similar expression of SMN but a dramatic reduction of cells displaying SMN accumulation in Cajal bodies (CB). SMN strongly accumulated in CB in more than 50% of unrelated control cell fibroblasts as well as in fibroblasts from the parent carrying only the c.2974delC (p.(Leu992Tyrfs*168)) variant (predicted to cause loss-of-function). In contrast, only 22% of cells showed respective SMN accumulations in patient fibroblasts (p = 1.9-2.5 × 10) while showing a higher level of nucleoplasmic SMN. Furthermore, the remaining accumulations in patient cells displayed weaker SMN signals than control or heterozygous wt/c.2974delC (p.(Leu992Tyrfs*168)) fibroblasts. Our report provides the first description of the clinical phenotype of recessive PTPN23 variants with pathogenicity substantiated by a functional study.

The activity of the SMN complex in promoting the assembly of pre-mRNA processing UsnRNPs correlates with condensation of the complex in nuclear Cajal bodies. While mechanistic details of its activity have been elucidated, the molecular basis for condensation remains unclear. High SMN complex phosphorylation suggests extensive regulation. Here, we report on systematic siRNA-based screening for modulators of the capacity of SMN to condense in Cajal bodies and identify mTOR and ribosomal protein S6 kinase b-1 as key regulators. Proteomic analysis reveals TOR-dependent phosphorylations in SMN complex subunits. Using stably expressed or optogenetically controlled phospho mutants, we demonstrate that serine 49 and 63 phosphorylation of human SMN controls the capacity of the complex to condense in Cajal bodies via liquid-liquid phase separation. Our findings link SMN complex condensation and UsnRNP biogenesis to cellular energy levels and suggest modulation of TOR signaling as a rational concept for therapy of the SMN-linked neuromuscular disorder spinal muscular atrophy.

No abstract