Ocular surface disease is common in those using topical antiglaucoma medications. Abnormal TBUT is associated with increasing number of eye drops and benzalkonium chloride-containing eye drops, although this also occurs with the use of preservative-free eye drops.

No abstract

No abstract

BackgroundVascular insufficiency has been reported to be a cause of normal tension glaucoma (NTG). The aim of this study was to compare ocular perfusion pressure (OPP) and ophthalmic artery flow (OAF) between patients with NTG and those without glaucoma.MethodsWe considered one eye each from 31 NTG and 15 non-glaucoma control patients. Blood pressure and intraocular pressure (IOP) were measured in the sitting position, for calculation of OPP. Humphrey visual field (HVF) assessment was then carried out on NTG patients. All patients then underwent Transcranial Doppler ultrasound measurements of OAF parameters, including mean flow velocity (MFV), end diastolic velocity (EDV), peak systolic velocity (PSV) and resistive index (RI). We looked at differences in OPP and OAF parameters between the two groups, and their correlations in NTG patients. T-tests, χ2, ANOVA and Pearson Correlation tests were performed, with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant.ResultsThere were no statistically significant differences in OPP between the NTG and control groups (60.5+/-8.7 mmHg and 62.9+/-10.2 mmHg respectively, p = 0.393), and also no statistically significant differences in MFV, EDV, PSV and RI (all p > 0.05). In the NTG group, there were positive correlations between OPP and both MFV (r = 0.416, p = 0.020) and EDV (r = 0.369, p = 0.041). There were no statistically significant correlations between HVF mean deviation and OPP or OAF parameters (all p > 0.05).ConclusionThere is no difference in OPP and OAF parameters between patients with NTG and non-glaucoma controls, suggesting that vascular insufficiency or dysregulation by themselves may not account for the pathogenesis of NTG.

Background: This study aims to collect local Malaysian data regarding the ophthalmic features and complications in craniosynostosis patients who attended the Combined Craniofacial Clinic (CFC) in University Malaya Medical Centre (UMMC). Methods: Retrospective study of medical notes of craniosynostosis patients who attended the CFC in UMMC from 2014 to December 2020. Results: Out of 37 patients, 29 had syndromic craniosynostosis, and 8 had non-syndromic craniosynostosis. Visual impairment was present in 32.1% of patients. Causes for visual impairment were as follows – amblyopia (25.0%), exposure keratopathy (3.6%), and optic atrophy (3.6%). Hypermetropia and myopia were each seen in 20.6% of patients. Astigmatism was seen in 47.1% of patients, and 29.1% had anisometropia. Proptosis was present in 78.6% and lagophthalmos in 53.3% of patients. Strabismus in primary position occurred in 51.7% of patients. Thirty-one percent of the patients had exposure keratopathy. Optic disc atrophy was seen in 13.7% of patients, and 8.3% had optic disc swelling. Optic disc swelling was resolved in all patients who underwent craniofacial surgery. Conclusion: Our experience in Malaysia was consistent with previously reported data on ophthalmic features of craniosynostosis patients. Additionally, we found that non-syndromic craniosynostosis patients are also at risk of ocular complications just as much as syndromic patients. Appropriate treatment of amblyogenic risk factors, ocular complications, and timely detection of papilledema, and prompt surgical intervention are crucial in preserving long-term visual function in these patients.