OBJECTIVE To estimate the prevalence of the contraindicated use of oral contraceptives and the associated factors in Brazilian women.METHODS 20,454 women who answered the VIGITEL survey in 2008 also participated in this study, of which 3,985 reported using oral contraceptives. We defined the following conditions for the contraindicated use of contraceptives: hypertension; cardiovascular diseases such as heart attack, stroke/cerebrovascular accident; diabetes mellitus; being smoker and 35 years old or older. We estimated the prevalence and 95% confidence intervals of contraindicated use in users of oral contraceptives and the factors associated with contraindication by prevalence ratio and 95% confidence intervals.RESULTS In the total population, 21% (95%CI 19.7–21.9) of women showed some contraindication to the use of oral contraceptives, of which 11.7% (95%CI 10.6–13.7) belonged to the group of users of oral contraceptives. The most frequent contraindication in users of oral contraceptives was hypertension (9.1%). The largest proportion of women with at least one contraindication was aged between 45 and 49 years (45.8%) and with education level between zero and eight years (23.8%). The prevalence of contraindication to oral contraceptives was higher in women less educated (zero to eight years of study) (PR = 2.46; 95%CI 1.57–3.86; p < 0.05) and with age between 35-44 years (PR = 4.00; 95%CI 2.34–6.83) and 45-49 years (PR = 5.59; 95%CI 2.90–10.75).CONCLUSIONS Age greater than or equal to 35 and low education level were demographic and iniquity factors, respectively, in the contraindicated use of oral contraceptives.

Background Although a great number of teleconsultation services have been developed during the COVID-19 pandemic, studies assessing usability and health care provider satisfaction are still incipient. Objective This study aimed to describe the development, implementation, and expansion of a synchronous teleconsultation service targeting patients with symptoms of COVID-19 in Brazil, as well as to assess its usability and health care professionals’ satisfaction. Methods This mixed methods study was developed in 5 phases: (1) the identification of components, technical and functional requirements, and system architecture; (2) system and user interface development and validation; (3) pilot-testing in the city of Divinópolis; (4) expansion in the cities of Divinópolis, Teófilo Otoni, and Belo Horizonte for Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais faculty and students; and (5) usability and satisfaction assessment, using Likert-scale and open-ended questions. Results During pilot development, problems contacting users were solved by introducing standardized SMS text messages, which were sent to users to obtain their feedback and keep track of them. Until April 2022, the expanded system served 31,966 patients in 146,158 teleconsultations. Teleconsultations were initiated through chatbot in 27.7% (40,486/146,158) of cases. Teleconsultation efficiency per city was 93.7% (13,317/14,212) in Teófilo Otoni, 92.4% (11,747/12,713) in Divinópolis, and 98.8% (4981/5041) in Belo Horizonte (university campus), thus avoiding in-person assistance for a great majority of patients. In total, 50 (83%) out of 60 health care professionals assessed the system’s usability as satisfactory, despite a few system instability problems. Conclusions The system provided updated information about COVID-19 and enabled remote care for thousands of patients, which evidenced the critical role of telemedicine in expanding emergency services capacity during the pandemic. The dynamic nature of the current pandemic required fast planning, implementation, development, and updates in the system. Usability and satisfaction assessment was key to identifying areas for improvement. The experience reported here is expected to inform telemedicine strategies to be implemented in a postpandemic scenario.

Objective: To analyze the spatial distribution of the prevalence of leisure-time physical activity (LTPA) in a Brazilian urban area and its association with the characteristics of the physical and social environments. Methods: A cross-sectional study conducted with data from the Surveillance System for Risk and Protective Factors for Chronic Diseases from the years 2008–2010, in Belo Horizonte, state of Minas Gerais, Brazil. The outcome was the practice of LTPA and the independent variables were residential and population density, the density of places for physical activity, homicide rates, average family income, and health vulnerability index. The spatial scanning technique was employed to identify clusters with a high prevalence of PA at leisure time. The Mann-Whitney test was used to compare variables inside and outside the cluster. Results: The sample included 5,779 participants, 33.3% (SE = 0.73) of whom reported sufficient PA during leisure time. We identified a significant cluster of a high prevalence of LTPA. After adjustments, the cluster presented a radius of 3,041.99 meters and 603 individuals, and 293 (48.6%) of them reported sufficient LTPA. The probability of performing sufficient LTPA in the cluster was 27% higher (PR = 1.27; p = 0.002) than in the coverage areas of primary healthcare units outside the cluster. There was a higher density of places for LTPA practice, higher population and residential density, and higher family income in the cluster. Conclusion: The results evidenced a cluster of high prevalence of LTPA in a privileged physical and socioeconomic environment in Belo Horizonte, even after adjustments, demonstrating that reducing inequalities can increase LTPA.

No abstract

Introduction: Following the inception of the COVID-19 pandemic, chloroquine compounds were proposed as potential therapeutic strategies, at the cost of a potential increase in cardiovascular risk. We aimed to evaluate clinical outcomes of patients with COVID-19, comparing those using chloroquine compounds to individuals without specific treatment. Methods: Outpatients with suspected COVID-19 in Brazil who had at least 1 ECG transmitted to a Telehealth Network, were prospectively enrolled in 2 arms (G1: treatment with chloroquine compounds and G2: without specific treatment) and G3: registry of other specific treatments. Outcomes were assessed through follow-up phone calls on days 3 and 14, and also administratively collected from national mortality and hospitalization databases. The primary outcome was composed of: hospitalization and all-cause death. The association between treatment groups and the primary outcome was evaluated by logistic regression. Significant variables (p<0.10) were included in 4 multivariate models: 1: unadjusted; 2: adjusted for age and sex; 3: adjusted for model 2 plus cardiovascular risk factors and 4: adjusted for model 3 plus COVID-19 symptoms (when available from phone contact). Results: In 303 days, 712 (10.2%) patients were allocated in G1 (chloroquine), 3623 (52.1%) in G2 (control) and 2622 (37.7%) in G3 (other treatments). Median age was 49 (IQR 38 - 62) years, 57% women. Of these, 1969 had successful phone contacts (G1: 260; G2: 871; G3: 838). The primary outcome was more frequent in groups 1 and 3 compared to the control group, when assessed exclusively by phone (G1: 38,5% vs. G2: 18,0% vs. G3: 34,2%, p<0,001) or combined with administrative data (G1: 19,5% vs. G2: 11,0% vs. G3: 18,2%, p<0,001). In the adjusted models, chloroquine independently associated with a greater chance of the primary outcome: phone contact (model 4): OR=3.24 (95% CI 2.31 - 4.54), p<0.001; phone + administrative data (model 3): OR=1.99 (95% CI 1.61 - 2.44), p<0.001. Chloroquine also independently associated with higher mortality, as assessed by phone + administrative data (model 3): OR=1.67 (95% CI 1.20 - 2.28). Conclusion: Chloroquine compounds associated with a higher risk of poor outcomes in outpatients with COVID-19 compared to standard care.