Objetivo: Identificar a produção científica acerca do tema advocacia do paciente por enfermeiros no contexto da terapia intensiva entre os anos de 2010 a 2020. Métodos: Revisão integrativa da literatura sobre o tema advocacia do paciente em unidade de terapia intensiva (UTI) entre os anos de 2010 a 2020, realizada nas bases de dados: Publisher Medline (PUBMED), Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde (LILACS), Cochrane Library e Web of Science, e também na biblioteca eletrônica Scientific Electronic Library Online (SCIELO) Com a busca nas base de dados, e na biblioteca eletrônica, foram encontradas 217 referências, das quais, 18 atenderam aos critérios de inclusão e exclusão da pesquisa. Resultado: Os 18 artigos selecionados foram categorizados conforme os temas identificados com maior recorrência, os quais consistem em: enfermeiro como defensor do paciente e família, barreiras para a defesa do paciente e enfermeiro como articulador entre equipe, paciente e família. Conclusão: Essa revisão possibilita levar ao meio científico, o que vem sendo estudado acerca da advocacia do paciente em UTI nos últimos 10 anos, em âmbito nacional e internacional, além de evidenciar à importância do enfermeiro enquanto defensor dos direitos do paciente e da família, explanar sobre as barreiras existentes para que a advocacia do paciente pelo enfermeiro intensivista ocorra de forma qualificada, e também demonstra como o enfermeiro executa o papel de intermediário entre seu paciente, família e equipe multiprofissional.
Background: the concept of Healthy Work Environments is part of the context of professional training in nursing as a reference for promoting the health of the subjects of this process. Objective: to identify how professors and students of undergraduate courses in Nursing perceive the “Healthy Work Environments” in the teaching-learning process. Method: scoping review performed in PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, LILACS and BDENF, considering studies regardless of type, language and year of publication. The guiding question was guided by the mnemonic strategy: Population, Concept, Context. The data underwent descriptive, bibliometric and exploratory analysis. Results: 386 references were identified, 83 were selected to be read in full, of which 56 were part of the final sample. Thus, two categories were created: “Healthy Work Environments: spaces for teaching and health services” and “Strategies for promoting a Healthy Environment”. Conclusion: the concepts under analysis show the experiences of students in environments of educational institutions and health services. Regarding the teachers' practices, working conditions emerged in areas of infrastructure, subjectivities and institutional organization and work policies.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.