Chronic stress during adolescence is associated with an increased risk for alcoholism and addictive disorders. Addiction is also associated with increased impulsivity, and stress during adolescence could alter cortical circuits responsible for response inhibition. Therefore, the present study determined the effect of chronic exposure to the stress hormone corticosterone (CORT) during adolescence on tests of impulsivity in adulthood and examined possible biochemical mechanisms. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were exposed to CORT by their drinking water during adolescence (post-natal day 30-50). The rats were then tested in adulthood to assess behavior on the 5-choice serial reaction time task (5CSRTT), stop-signal reaction time task (SSRTT), and the delay-discounting task, which differentially assess attention, impulsive action, and impulsive choice. Yohimbine-induced impulsivity on the 5CSRTT and biochemical analysis of the lateral orbital frontal cortex (lOFC) was also assessed owing to the ability of yohimbine to activate the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and influence impulsivity. Adolescent CORT-treated rats were found to behave largely like controls on the 5CSRTT, but did show reduced premature responses when the intertrial interval was increased. Nevertheless, the CORT-treated rats tended to have more yohimbineinduced impulsive responses at low doses on this task, which was not found to be due to increased pCREB in the lOFC, but could be related to a higher expression/activity of the AMPA receptor subunit GluR1. Adolescent CORT-treated rats performed more accurately on the SSRTT, but showed greater impulsivity on the delay-discounting task, as indicated by steeper discounting functions. Therefore, adolescent CORT exposure reduced impulsive action but increased impulsive choice, indicating that chronic stress hormone exposure in adolescence can have long-term consequences on behavior.
BackgroundImmunosuppressive therapies have led to improved survival for lung transplant (LT) recipients but these therapies can lead to hypogammaglobulinemia (HGG) and potentially an increased risk of infection. Large prospective studies have not been performed to evaluate the impact of HGG on outcomes for LT recipients.MethodsThis is a single-center prospective observational study of LT recipients. Pretransplant and posttransplant IgG levels were measured and related to infection, rejection, antibiotic use, and immunosuppression use.ResultsOne hundred thirty-three LT recipients were prospectively evaluated. Pretransplant IgG values were higher than IgG values at the time of transplant or any time thereafter (all P < 0.0001). Severe HGG (IgG < 400 mg/dL) was highest at the time of transplant (32.4%) while at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months posttransplant the prevalence of severe HGG was 7.4%, 7.5%, 8.9%, and 6.3%, respectively. Severe HGG was associated with 2 or more pneumonias (P = 0.0006) and increased number of antibiotic courses (P = 0.003) compared with the subjects without severe HGG. Pretransplant IgG level and less than 30% of pretransplant protective pneumococcal antibody levels were identified as pretransplant risk factors for severe HGG. In multivariate analysis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease as the underlying disease and the use of basiliximab as the induction agent in conjunction with higher prednisone and mycophenolate dosing were most predictive of severe HGG (P = 0.005), whereas the combination of age, severe HGG and number of acute steroid courses were most predictive of total days of pneumonia (P = 0.0001).ConclusionsOur large prospective study identifies risk factors for severe HGG after LT and demonstrates that LT recipients with severe HGG are at increased risk for recurrent pneumonias and more antibiotic courses.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.