Abstract-Successful development of software systems requires a set of complete, consistent and clear requirements. A wide range of different stakeholders with various needs and backgrounds participate in the requirements engineering process. Accordingly, it is difficult to completely satisfy the requirements of each and every stakeholder. It is the requirements engineer's job to trade-off stakeholders' needs with the project resources and constraints. Many studies assert that failure in understanding and managing requirements in general, and requirement conflicts in particular, are one of the main problems of exceeding cost and allocated time which in turn results in project failure. This paper aims at investigating the different reasons of requirements conflicts and the different types of requirements conflicts. It providing an overview of existing research works on identifying conflicts; and discussing their limitations in order to yield suggestions for improvement. Objective: To provide an overview of existing research studies on identifying software requirements conflict and identifying limitations and areas for improvement. Method: A comparative literature was conducted by assessing 20 studies dated from 2001 to 2014.

Considerable research has demonstrated how effective requirements engineering is critical for the success of software projects. Requirements engineering has been established and recognized as one of the most important aspects of software engineering as of late. It is noteworthy to mention that requirement consistency is a critical factor in project success, and conflicts in requirements lead to waste of cost, time, and effort. A considerable number of research studies have shown the risks and problems caused by working with requirements that are in conflict with other requirements. These risks include running overtime or over budget, which may lead to project failure. At the very least, it would result in the extra expended effort. Various studies have also stated that failure in managing requirement conflicts is one of the main reasons for unsuccessful software projects due to high cost and insufficient time. Many prior research studies have proposed manual techniques to detect conflicts, whereas other research recommends automated approaches based on human analysis. Moreover, there are different resolutions for conflicting requirements. Our previous work proposed a scheme for dealing with this problem using a novel intelligent method to detect conflicts and resolve them. A rule-based system was proposed to identify conflicts in requirements, and a genetic algorithm (GA) was used to resolve conflicts. The objective of this work is to assess and evaluate the implementation of the method of minimizing the number of conflicts in the requirements. The methodology implemented comprises two different stages. The first stage, detecting conflicts using a rule-based system, demonstrated a correct result with 100% accuracy. The evaluation of using the GA to resolve and reduce conflicts in the second stage also displayed a good result and achieved the desired goal as well as the main objective of the research.

Today, quality of human life rests greatly on correct diagnostics and medication. Medical errors are both costly and harmful. Medication accounts for the largest percentage of medical errors but several types of information technology have the potential to reduce the frequency of medication errors. This paper demonstrates how we can benefit from knowledge management technologies to improve patient safety and reduce medication errors. In principle, it focuses on Electronic Medical Record (EMR) as the first step toward decreasing medication errors, Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS) and Computerised Physician Order Entry (CPOE) as a knowledge retrieval and error detection technology. The paper proposes a model that applies the three technologies (EMR, CDSS and CPOE) simultaneously to give good results in the reduction of medication errors.Keywords-knowledge management; medication errors; electronic medical record (EMR); clinical decision support system (CDSS); computerised physician order entry (CPOE)

No abstract