BackgroundBasic studies have shown that glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogs exert a direct protective effect on the vascular endothelium in addition to their indirect effects on postprandial glucose and lipid metabolism. GLP-1 analogs are also reported to inhibit postprandial vascular endothelial dysfunction. This study examined whether the GLP-1 analog exenatide inhibits postprandial vascular endothelial dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).MethodsSeventeen patients with T2DM underwent a meal tolerance test to examine changes in postprandial vascular endothelial function and in glucose and lipid metabolism, both without exenatide (baseline) and after a single subcutaneous injection of 10 μg exenatide. Vascular endothelial function was determined using reactive hyperemia index (RHI) measured by peripheral arterial tonometry before and 120 min after the meal loading test. The primary endpoint was the difference in changes in postprandial vascular endothelial function between the baseline and exenatide tests.ResultsThe natural logarithmically-scaled RHI (L_RHI) was significantly lower after the baseline meal test but not in the exenatide test. The use of exenatide resulted in a significant decrease in triglycerides (TG) area under the curve and coefficient of variation (CV). The change in L_RHI correlated with changes in CV of triglycerides and HDL-cholesterol. Multivariate analysis identified changes in triglyceride CV as the only determinant of changes in L_RHI, contributing to 41% of the observed change.ConclusionsExenatide inhibited postprandial vascular endothelial dysfunction after the meal loading test, suggesting that exenatide has a multiphasic anti-atherogenic action involving not only glucose but also lipid metabolism.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: UMIN000015699.

compared with sitagliptin for patients with type 2 diabetes who do not have adequate glycemic control with metformin plus sulfonylurea: a 52-week randomized trial. Diabetes Care 2013;36:2508-2515 In the print version of the article listed above, the fasting plasma glucose (FPG) data in conventional units (mg/dL) are not correct in Fig. 2C. The FPG data in SI units are correct; therefore, the conclusions do not change. The corrected Fig. 2C appears below. The online version reflects these changes. 4172DIABETES CARE, VOLUME 36, DECEMBER 2013 care.diabetesjournals.org

Aims/IntroductionHigh fluctuations in blood glucose are associated with various complications. The correlation between glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level and fluctuations in blood glucose level has not been studied in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes. In the present study, blood glucose profile stratified by HbA1c level was evaluated by continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in Japanese type 2 diabetes patients.Materials and MethodsOur retrospective study included 294 patients with type 2 diabetes who were divided by HbA1c level into five groups (≥6.0 to <7.0%, ≥7.0 to <8.0%, ≥8.0 to <9.0%, ≥9.0 to <10.0% and ≥10%). The correlation between HbA1c level and CGM data was analyzed. The primary end‐point was the difference in blood glucose fluctuations among the HbA1c groups.ResultsThe mean blood glucose level increased significantly with increasing HbA1c (P trend < 0.01). The standard deviation increased with increases in HbA1c (P trend < 0.01). The mean amplitude of glycemic excursions did not vary significantly with HbA1c. The levels of maximum blood glucose, minimum blood glucose, each preprandial blood glucose, each postprandial maximum blood glucose, range of increase in postprandial glucose from pre‐meal to after breakfast, the area under the blood concentration–time curve >180 mg/dL and percentage of the area under the blood concentration–time curve >180 mg/dL were higher with higher HbA1c. Mean glucose level and pre‐breakfast blood glucose level were significant and independent determinants of HbA1c.ConclusionsIn Japanese patients treated for type 2 diabetes, the mean amplitude of glycemic excursions did not correlate with HbA1c, making it difficult to assess blood glucose fluctuations using HbA1c. Parameters other than HbA1c are required to evaluate fluctuations in blood glucose level in patients receiving treatment for type 2 diabetes.

Objective Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are both complicated by arteriosclerosis, resulting in increased rates of cardiovascular events. No previous studies have compared the index between RA and T2DM. We assessed the vascular endothelial function in early-stage arteriosclerosis for each disease to determine the influential factors and compared the extent to which these two diseases cause vascular endothelial dysfunction. Methods This study is a retrospective study based on medical records. Differences in the reactive hyperemia index (RHI) among the groups and factors affecting the RHI in each group was analyzed. The vascular endothelial function was assessed by measuring the RHI using peripheral arterial tonometry. Patients The study subjects were 114 patients with non-functional thyroid tumors (healthy n=14), T2DM (T2DM n=64), and RA (RA n=36). Results The RHI was 2.29 in the control, 1.85 in the T2DM, and 1.83 in the RA group, with values lower in the T2DM and RA groups than in the control group (p=0.033) but not markedly different between the two disease groups. The RHI distribution (<1.68/1.68 to <2.10/≥2.1) was as follows: control group: 14.3%/28.6%/57.1%; T2DM group: 42.2%/39.1%/18.8%; and RA group: 36.1%/44.4%/19.4% (p=0.031), respectively. A multivariate analysis identified the triglyceride level and dyslipidemia in the control group and the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints with the erythrocyte sedimentation rate and fasting plasma glucose level in the RA group to influence the RHI. Conclusion The vascular endothelial function was impaired in approximately 80% of patients with T2DM and RA, with comparable degrees of impairment between the two diseases. No factors affecting the function were identified in the T2DM group, while the function was more impaired in patients with a higher disease activity in the RA group.

No abstract