Objective:Endotracheal intubation is a common procedure in neonatal care. The objective of this study was to determine whether the premedication with remifentanil before intubation has analgesic effects in newborn infants.Methods:A total of 40 premature infants who needed endotracheal intubation for intubation-surfactant-extubation method were randomly assigned in two groups of an equal number at two university hospitals. The control group was given 10 μg/kg atropine IV infusions in 1 min and then 2 ml normal saline. In the case group, the atropine was given with the same method and then remifentanil was administered 2 μg/kg IV infusions in 2 min.Findings:For remifentanil and control groups, the mean birth weight were 1761 ± 64 and 1447 ± 63 grams (P = 0.29), and the mean gestational ages were 31.69 ± 3.5 and 30.56 ± 2.8 weeks (P = 0.28), respectively. Using premature infant pain profile score, infants who received remifentanil felt significantly less pain than the control group (15.1 ± 1.6 vs. 7.5 ± 1.4; P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the duration of endotracheal intubation procedure (20.8 ± 6 vs. 22.8 ± 7.3 s; P = 0.33), the number of attempts for successful intubation and oxygen desaturation between groups.Conclusion:Premedication with remifentanil has good analgesic effects for endotracheal intubation in premature infants without significant derangements in mean blood pressure and oxygen saturation.

Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of levetiracetam (LEV) in the management of seizures in neonates.Methods:A prospective non-blind, single arm clinical trial conducted in the Department of Neonatology and Pediatric Intensive Care, Mohamad Kermanshahi, and Imam Reza Hospital, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran from May 2014 to December 2014. Fifty out of 60 newborns with gestational age ≥30 weeks with clinically diagnosed seizures were included. Levetiracetam was administered orally with an initial dose of 10 mg/kg twice a day. The patients were observed continuously by Neuro Intensive Care nurses, and visited daily by a neuropediatrician in the first 7 days and then at days 14, 30, and 90 after the start of LEV administration. Clinical examination was performed for every patient, and seizure number, antiepileptic medication, and adverse events were detailed at every visit.Results:47 infants were seizure free under LEV at the end of the first week, 47remained seizure free at 4 weeks, and 46 remained seizure free at 11 weeks. No immediate and long-term side effects were noted in our patients.Conclusion:This study investigated the efficacy and safety of LEV in neonatal seizure control but confirmation with further randomized controlled trials is required.

The prevalence of patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) in preterm infants is high. There is little information about the therapeutic effect and safety of rectal acetaminophen in the treatment of PDA. We aimed to compare the therapeutic effect and safety of oral and rectal acetaminophen on PDA in preterm infants. This study was a single-blind randomized clinical trial using 40 preterm infants. The cases were hospitalized in the neonatal intensive care unit of Mohammad Kermanshahi and Imam Reza hospitals of Kermanshah. Subjects were randomly divided into 2 groups, the first group was treated with oral acetaminophen and the second group was treated with rectal acetaminophen. The presence of PDA and response to treatment was assessed based on pre- and post-treatment echocardiographic criteria. The likelihood of complications or prohibition of acetaminophen use was assessed with paraclinical tests before and after treatment. The neonates were in the age range of 30 to 35 weeks. Twenty-one cases (52.5%) were boys and 19 cases (47.5%) were girls. Two cases in the oral-acetaminophen group and 1 case in the rectal-acetaminophen group needed the second round of treatment. There was no difference between the success of treatment and the type of treatment. The study showed that there was no difference between PDA treatment of preterm infants with oral and rectal acetaminophen. Also, no side effects were observed in treatment with any of the treatments. Therefore, it could be suggested that in infants who are intolerant to oral acetaminophen, the rectal form can be used.