Advancing nutrient recovery from idea to implementation requires reporting practices that facilitate comparison among diverse nutrient removal and recovery (NRR) technologies and enhance the translation of academic research to practice. We reviewed 157 technologies that treat nitrogen-and/or phosphorusladen wastewater across several underlying mechanisms, stages of development, and scales of operation. We outline a systematic reporting and analysis framework to characterize NRR technologies using quantitative performance metrics (i.e., removal and recovery efficiency, removal and recovery rate, energy consumption, cost, greenhouse gas emissions, effluent concentration) and qualitative attributes (e.g., technology readiness level). Comparing peerreviewed literature with practitioner needs reveals limited reporting of energy consumption and cost, indicating misalignment between research and practice. By synthesizing literature and practitioner input on anticipated benefits, barriers to adoption, and knowledge gaps, we identify opportunities for expanding benefits achieved by NRR technologies and aligning research with critical barriers. We propose a research agenda addressing the most reported gaps (e.g., underlying process mechanisms, scale-up) and emphasizing rigorous investigations of systems-level impacts and product-market fit. Results from this study will facilitate interdisciplinary research on NRR technologies, guide technology development by academics and practitioners, and accelerate implementation for resource-efficient nutrient management fit for 21 st century challenges.

No abstract

Enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) is strongly influenced by the influent ratio of readily biodegradable carbon to soluble phosphorus due to the preferences of phosphorus-accumulating organisms (PAO). The sidestream EBPR (S2EBPR) process redirects a portion of return activated sludge (RAS) to a sidestream fermenter, increasing the availability of biodegradable carbon. In this study, we assessed the performance and microbial community structure of a full-scale S2EBPR demonstration supplemented with external carbon dosing. By the end of the 10 month study period, the demonstration achieved a median effluent orthophosphate of 0.3 mg/L. The microbial community consisted of a common core microbiome in the RAS fermenter, EBPR basin, and nitrification basin. The most abundant PAO detected were Ca. “Dechloromonas phosphorivorans”, while the canonical PAO Ca. “Accumulibacter” and Tetrasphaera were observed in lower relative abundance. In addition to non-canonical PAO enrichment, the glycogen-accumulating organism Ca. “Competibacter” proliferated throughout the study and at some points outnumbered PAO taxa by 30 to 1 with no tangible performance impacts. This study provides insights into successful S2EBPR implementation at a low-carbon facility and improves our understanding of microbial community structure and key PAO and GAO in S2EBPR systems.

No abstract