No abstract

No abstract

With growing interest in rocking structures, it is important to quantify the effects of ground motion processing schemes on rocking response. To this end, this paper studied the influence of different ground motion correction schemes and parameter values on the rocking displacement spectrum. When the problem is treated on an individual ground motion basis, then it seems that ground motion correction does have an influence on the rocking response, especially for more slender blocks. This influence is larger for causal filtering. However, no specific trend related to the cut off period of the filter can be observed (at least for cut off periods longer than or equal to 10 s) or on the type of the recording device (analog or digital). On the other hand, when treating the problem statistically (by comparing the statistics of the response due to sets of ground motion, not a single ground motion), the effect is significantly reduced: The processing schemes do not induce any significant bias to the rocking response and the motion‐to‐motion variability seems more important than the ground motion correction method. This conclusion applies to both analog and digital records, both causal and acausal filters, and to all near field pulse like, near field no pulse like, and far field records.