Breast pCR is highly correlated with nodal status after NCT, and the risk for missing nodal metastases without axillary surgery in this cohort is extremely low. These data provide the fundamental basis and rationale for management of the axilla in clinical trials of omission of cancer surgery when image-guided biopsy indicates a breast pCR.
After NST, image-guided FNA/VACB can accurately identify patients with a breast pCR. Based on these results, a prospective clinical trial has commenced in which breast surgery is omitted in patients with a breast pCR after NST according to image-guided biopsy.
Synopsis
Neoadjuvant systemic therapy in the treatment of breast cancer was initially employed for patients with inoperable disease. Over the past several decades this treatment approach has proved beneficial in many other patients including those with early-stage, operable breast cancer. Several randomized prospective studies have shown comparable survival rates when compared with adjuvant systemic therapy. Additionally, neoadjuvant chemotherapy can decrease the tumor burden facilitating breast conservation in selected patients without significant increases in local recurrence. Response to therapy has proven to be a strong predictor of outcome, with patients achieving pathologic complete response (pCR) demonstrating improved survival compared with those achieving less than a pCR. Furthermore, molecular subtype analysis has shown improved response following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in certain tumor types providing patients with the most aggressive subtypes a chance at cure with targeted therapies. In particular, targeting the HER2-positive subtype with trastuzumab and other HER2-directed therapies has markedly improved the outcome in these patients. Conversely, the early recognition of poor responders is important in limiting the toxicity of ineffective therapy and altering management. Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive tumors consistently decreases tumor size improving rates of breast conservation. Aromatase inhibitors have demonstrated superiority to tamoxifen with improved response and favorable toxicity profiles. Imaging modalities have shown promise in predicting patients with pCR, however they have not yet eliminated the need for surgical intervention. Less invasive surgical strategies such as breast conserving surgery and sentinel lymph node dissection have been shown to be safe following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in selected patients. A multidisciplinary approach with primary systemic therapy when indicated, improves the likelihood for breast conservation, provides a window into tumor biology and predicts patient outcomes.
National and international experts in inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) from high-volume centers treating IBC recently convened at the 10th Anniversary Conference of the Morgan Welch Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Program at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston Texas. A consensus on the clinical management of patients with IBC was discussed, summarized, and subsequently reviewed. All participants at the conference (patients, advocates, researchers, trainees, and clinicians) were queried using the MDRing electronic survey on key management issues. A summary of the expert consensus and participant voting is presented. Bilateral breast and nodal evaluation, breast magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography/computed tomography, and medical photographs were endorsed as optimal. Neoadjuvant systemic therapy, modified radical mastectomy and level I and II ipsilateral axillary node dissection, post-mastectomy radiotherapy, adjuvant targeted therapy and hormonal therapy as indicated, and delayed reconstruction were agreed-upon fundamental premises of standard non-protocol-based treatment for IBC. Consideration for local-regional therapy in de novo stage IV IBC was endorsed to provide local control whenever feasible. Variation across centers and special circumstances were discussed.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.