As part of a case-control study, the Auckland Hip Fracture Study (1991-1994), the authors examined associations between impaired vision and risk of hip fracture. Subjects (911 cases and 910 controls aged 60 years or older) completed a questionnaire and had vision measurements taken, including measurements of visual acuity and stereopsis (depth perception). Binocular visual acuity worse than 20/60 was statistically significantly associated with increased risk of hip fracture after adjustment for age, sex, proxy response, hours of activity per week, and height (odds ratio (OR) = 1.5; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.1, 2.0), as was having poor vision (less than 20/100) in both eyes (OR = 2.4; 95% CI: 1.0, 6.1). Having no depth perception was associated with increased risk (OR = 6.0 95% CI: 3.2, 11.1), as were categories of decreasing stereopsis (trend p = 0.0001), self-reported poor vision (OR = 1.4; 95% CI: 1.0, 1.9), not wearing glasses at the time of the fall (OR = 1.2; 95% CI: 1.0, 1.6), and increasing time since the last eye examination (trend p = 0.03). The population attributable risk of hip fracture due to poor visual acuity or stereopsis was 40%. Visual factors are important fall-related factors which influence risk of hip fracture. Risk of hip fracture may be decreased by correcting refractive error, improving stereopsis, and administering regular eye examinations.

For both men and women who incur a hip fracture, the risks of dying or being institutionalized within 2 years are higher than for their peers. The independent effect of hip fracture on this outcome was significantly greater for men than women. The marked influences of prefracture health status, physical limitations, and gender on outcome have important implications for preventative strategies.

Strategies aimed at preventing fall-related hip fractures among the old old and among institutionalized individuals should focus primarily on the modification of intrinsic factors. Modification of environmental hazards has the greatest potential for prevention among the young old and those living in private homes.

This fall-prevention intervention did not reduce falls or injury from falls. Low-intensity intervention may be worse than usual care.