PHAB accreditation has stimulated QI and performance management activities within public health departments. Health departments that pursue PHAB accreditation are likely to report immediate increases in QI and performance management activities as a result of undergoing the PHAB accreditation process, and these benefits are likely to be reported at a higher level, even 1 year after the accreditation decision.

Introduction Appalachia is one of the regions most significantly impacted by the opioid crisis. This study investigated mortality due to diseases of despair within the Appalachian Region, with an additional focus on deaths attributable to opioid overdose. Methods Diseases of despair include: alcohol, prescription drug and illegal drug overdose, suicide, and alcoholic liver disease/cirrhosis of the liver. Mortality data from the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) National Vital Statistics System (NVSS) Multiple Cause of Death database were analyzed for this study, focusing on individuals aged 15–64. Results Over the past two decades, the mortality rate due to diseases of despair has been increasing across the United States, but the gap has widened between the Appalachian Region and the rest of the nation. In 2017, the combined diseases of despair mortality rate was 45% higher in the Appalachian Region than the non-Appalachian United States. When looking at just overdose mortality, this disparity grows to 65% higher in the Appalachian Region. Within the Appalachian region disparities are most notable in the Central and North Central Appalachian subregions, among males, and among individuals age 45 to 54. Discussion These findings document the scale and scope of the problem in Appalachia and highlight the need for additional research and discussion in terms of effective interventions, policies, and strategies to address these diseases of despair. Over the past two decades, mortality from overdose, suicide, and alcoholic liver diseases/cirrhosis has increased across the United States, but the disparity between Appalachia and the non-Appalachian U.S. continues to grow.

Healthy People continues to be a valued resource among public health stakeholders; however, continued outreach is needed to promote the use of tools and resources available on healthypeople.gov for this decade and beyond. Healthy People is a national initiative used most frequently as a data source by state and local health departments, tribal organizations, and other public health practitioners.

Background: While Healthy People outlines a national framework for improving the health of the nation, many states develop State Health Improvement Plans (SHIPs) to set priorities to improve the health of their residents. The purpose of this study was to understand the processes that states use to develop their SHIPs, how states align their SHIPs with Healthy People, and challenges that states face using Healthy People. Methods: NORC conducted semistructured interviews with 9 state health department representatives who were responsible for SHIPs. The responses were analyzed using qualitative thematic analysis. Results: State health departments used similar approaches to develop their SHIPs. Generally, states began the SHIP development process by performing community health assessments and then assembling diverse stakeholders to recommend key priority areas that should be addressed in the SHIP. States used a similar framework for their SHIPs, outlining priority areas, indicators, and targets. All respondents reported that they referenced Healthy People during the development of their SHIPs. Some states reported aligning their state plans with the Healthy People Framework, while others focused more on the specific Healthy People objectives or target setting guidance. Conclusions: Both the federal government and state public health agencies rely on input from stakeholders and cross-sector collaboration to ensure their initiatives reflect the diverse needs of their population. Stakeholder engagement is increasingly important as public health professionals are shifting toward a health equity approach that considers social determinants outside of the health care sector. Healthy People continues to strengthen this perspective by outlining national priorities on well-being while incorporating language around health equity issues. Reinforcing relationships between the federal government and state public health can help states better understand the role of Healthy People as well as encourage further dissemination of creative strategies and best practices.