Aims To describe how patients respond to early signs of foot problems and the factors that result in delays in care. Methods Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a large sample of Veterans from across the United States with diabetes mellitus who had undergone a toe amputation. Data were analyzed using inductive content analysis. Results We interviewed 61 male patients. Mean age was 66 years, 41% were married, and 37% had a high school education or less. The patient-level factors related to delayed care included: 1) not knowing something was wrong, 2) misinterpreting symptoms, 3) “sudden” and “unexpected” illness progression, and 4) competing priorities getting in the way of care-seeking. The system-level factors included: 5) asking patients to watch it, 6) difficulty getting the right type of care when needed, and 7) distance to care and other transportation barriers. Conclusion A confluence of patient factors (e.g., not examining their feet regularly or thoroughly and/or not acting quickly when they noticed something was wrong) and system factors (e.g., absence of a mechanism to support patient’s appraisal of symptoms, lack of access to timely and convenient-located appointments) delayed care. Identifying patient- and system-level interventions that can shorten or eliminate care delays could help reduce rates of limb loss.

Purpose The ultimate goal of anomia treatment should be to achieve gains in exemplars trained in the therapy session, as well as generalization to untrained exemplars and contexts. The purpose of this study was to test the efficacy of phonomotor treatment, a treatment focusing on enhancement of phonological sequence knowledge, against semantic feature analysis (SFA), a lexical-semantic therapy that focuses on enhancement of semantic knowledge and is well known and commonly used to treat anomia in aphasia. Method In a between-groups randomized controlled trial, 58 persons with aphasia characterized by anomia and phonological dysfunction were randomized to receive 56–60 hr of intensively delivered treatment over 6 weeks with testing pretreatment, posttreatment, and 3 months posttreatment termination. Results There was no significant between-groups difference on the primary outcome measure (untrained nouns phonologically and semantically unrelated to each treatment) at 3 months posttreatment. Significant within-group immediately posttreatment acquisition effects for confrontation naming and response latency were observed for both groups. Treatment-specific generalization effects for confrontation naming were observed for both groups immediately and 3 months posttreatment; a significant decrease in response latency was observed at both time points for the SFA group only. Finally, significant within-group differences on the Comprehensive Aphasia Test–Disability Questionnaire ( Swinburn, Porter, & Howard, 2004 ) were observed both immediately and 3 months posttreatment for the SFA group, and significant within-group differences on the Functional Outcome Questionnaire ( Glueckauf et al., 2003 ) were found for both treatment groups 3 months posttreatment. Discussion Our results are consistent with those of prior studies that have shown that SFA treatment and phonomotor treatment generalize to untrained words that share features (semantic or phonological sequence, respectively) with the training set. However, they show that there is no significant generalization to untrained words that do not share semantic features or phonological sequence features.

The views expressed here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the position of the Veterans Health Administration, United States government, or authors' respective academic institutions.

Introduction The Veterans Health Administration’s (VHA) history of enhancing Veterans’ healthcare access continued in 2016 with the launch of ChooseVA (née: MyVA Access). This initiative was designed to transform the VHA and rapidly increase Veteran’s access to care across all the VHA facilities. Relevant to this article include mandates to improve patient-centered scheduling. In prioritizing patient-centered scheduling, the VHA and other large healthcare systems have the paradoxical task of providing health care that meets not only the needs of individual patients but also the collective needs of the population served. To our knowledge, meeting these competing needs has not been explored through the perspectives and experiences of providers and staff implementing patient-centered scheduling practices. Materials and Methods This was a qualitative exploratory study and was sanctioned as quality improvement (and thus exempt from Institutional Review Board review). We conducted visits at 25 VHA facilities. Sites were selected based on rurality, region, and facility access performance ratings. Data collection included semi-structured interviews and focus groups. Key informant participants included local leadership, administrators, providers, and support staff across primary care, specialty care, and mental health service lines. We analyzed transcribed audio recordings using inductive content analysis to identify barriers, facilitators, and contextual factors affecting the implementation of patient-centered scheduling. Results We conducted 208 individual interviews and focus groups between July and November 2017. Participants expressed dedication to patient-centered approaches to improve access to care for Veterans, stating efforts and challenges to meeting Veterans’ needs and preferences. Being Veteran-centric meant accommodating Veterans, with a tension between meeting the needs of one Veteran versus all Veterans, managing expectations of same-day access, and potential hits to performance metrics. Strategies focused on engaging Veterans through education and establishing new expectations while recognizing the differing needs among subgroups receiving VHA care. Conclusions Veterans Health Administration staff employed a mission-driven, culturally sensitive approach to meeting the diverse scheduling needs of the Veteran population. While potentially unique to the VHA, it may inform patient-centered scheduling practices for other culturally specific populations in other healthcare systems. Continued efforts to put Veterans at the center of VHA healthcare delivery by engaging them in meaningful ways while honoring their distinct needs are essential. Data are forthcoming on Veterans’ perspectives of access, which we hope will further contribute to unfolding understandings of access within the VHA.

PurposeThe primary care physician shortage in the United States presents significant challenges for health systems seeking to maintain a sufficient primary care workforce. Perspectives on training or working in primary care in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) may yield insights into strategic recruitment to make the VHA and other health systems more attractive to primary care physicians. The authors sought to understand the experiences of resident and staff physicians with limited tenure within VHA primary care to identify factors to guide health systems in improving recruitment and retention.