No abstract

No abstract

in 2013, controversy sparked student protests, campus debates, and national attention when Smith College denied admittance to Calliope Wong-a trans woman. Since then, eight women's colleges have revised their admissions policies to include different gender identities such as trans women and genderqueer people. given the recency of such policies, we interrogate the ways the category "woman" is determined through certain alignments of biology-, legal-, and identity-based criteria. Through an inductive analysis of administrative scripts appearing both in student newspapers and in trans admittance policies, we highlight two areas U.S. women's colleges straddle while creating these policies: inclusion/exclusion scripts of self-identification and legal documentation, and tradition-/activism-speak. Through these tensions, women's college admittance policies not only construct "womanhood" but also serve as regulatory norms that redo gender as a structuring agent within the gendered organization.

No abstract

No abstract