Purpose
To determine the long-term effect of internal limiting membrane (ILM) with associated epiretinal membrane (ERM) peeling versus single peeling alone in terms of best-correct visual acuity (BCVA) and anatomical outcomes on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT).
Methods
This retrospective comparative cohort study of patients who had follow-up >1 year and underwent surgery for ERM by a single surgeon (SC) from January 1st, 2008-December 31st, 2012 compared cases in which the ILM was stained with brilliant blue G (BBG) to facilitate “double peeling” (n=42) to “single peeling” (n=43) of the ERM alone for up to 3 years of follow-up. For continuous variables, an independent 2-tailed t-test was performed. For binary variables, the Fisher exact test was performed. Statistical significance was defined as p<0.05.
Results
Eighty-five of 142 patients fit the inclusion criteria. At last follow-up, the single peeling group (SPG) were more likely to have ERM remaining in the central fovea postoperatively (p=0.0020, becoming significant by postoperative year 1, p=0.022) and less likely to develop inner retinal dimpling (IRD) (p=0.000, becoming significant by postoperative month 3, p=0.015). At 3 years, central foveal thickness had decreased in the SPG by −136.9-µm and by −84.1-µm in the double peeling group (DPG) respectively, which was not significantly different (p=0.08). Mean BCVA improved in both groups at all time points. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups at 3 years (p=0.44, SPG=0.32±0.42, Snellen 20/42 (mean±standard deviation); DPG=0.23±0.27, Snellen 20/34).
Conclusion
BBG-assisted ILM peeling for ERM results in a more thorough removal of residual ERM around the paracentral fovea. However, there is no difference in long-term BCVA at 3 years and a greater likelihood of IRD.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.