Central nervous system tuberculomas are rare and severe complications of tuberculosis. We performed a retrospective study of the clinical, biological, radiological, pathological, and therapeutic features of 23 patients. Almost all patients were from countries with a high prevalence of tuberculosis (22/23). Their mean age was 37.3 y; 43.5% had laboratory-proven meningitis and 17.4% had biopsy-proven tuberculomas. For most of the patients, the duration of treatment lasted 13-18 months. The disease was controlled without relapse in 16 patients and 3 patients died. Diagnosis relies on magnetic resonance imaging and bacteriological specimens from all the involved sites. This study indicates that central nervous system tuberculomas occur in young patients from high risk countries. The anti-tuberculous drug regimen in this series was 2 months of isoniazid, rifampin, pyrazinamide and ethambutol, followed by at least 10 months of isoniazid and rifampin. Results did not contradict the use of a 12-month regimen as currently recommended.

Purpose of review The pathogenesis of bone fragility in diabetes has not been fully characterized. The antifracture efficacy of available therapies remains unproven in patients with diabetes. We aim to collate current evidence of the treatment of diabetic bone fragility, and to provide a rationale for considering optimal therapeutic option in patients with diabetes. Recent findings The antifracture efficacy of antiresorptive and anabolic therapies is well established in patients without diabetes. Studies in patients with osteoporosis have shown that anabolic therapies lead to faster and larger benefits to bone mineral density and offer greater protection against fracture than antiresorptive therapies. Available data suggest that antiresorptive and anabolic therapies have similar effect on bone density and fracture risk reduction in patients with and without diabetes. However, the evidence in diabetes is limited to observational studies and post hoc analyses of osteoporosis studies. Summary There are no specific guidelines for the treatment of bone fragility in patients with diabetes. We offer a rationale for use of anabolic therapies in diabetes which is a low bone formation state, in contrast to postmenopausal osteoporosis that is characterized by increased bone turnover. Prospective studies evaluating the effect of available therapies on bone quality and fracture outcomes in patients with diabetes are needed.

Summary NEET (Not in Education, Employment or Training) is a major social worry in many countries. This article demonstrates how the Sensation Approach helps in individualising these cases so as to come to a Homeopathic simillimum. The varying methods of case taking in both cases and the results achieved thereby are illustrative of the depth of this Approach.

Treatment of hypothyroidism is predominantly with levothyroxine due to its ability to generate stable T3 levels and its long half-life. Many patients report continued hypothyroid symptoms despite normal TSH values on levothyroxine and request to switch to desiccated animal thyroid extract. Desiccated thyroid extract is less used for fear of side effects and risks. There are only a handful of studies available comparing desiccated animal thyroid extract to levothyroxine. We conducted a retrospective study on 250 hypothyroid patients over the age of 18 who presented to our clinic from 2008-2018. We excluded patients who had a history of thyroid cancer and documented non-adherence. We analyzed 125 patients on levothyroxine (males=43, females=82) and 125 patients who were on levothyroxine but chose to switch to Armour Thyroid (males=7, females=118). We examined the following variables; when comparisons of proportions were made between the two groups, N-1 chi square test was used to determine significance. 1. Reason for change to Armour Thyroid from levothyroxine: Top reasons were fatigue (n=51/125, 40.8%), inability to lose weight (n=32/125, 25.6%), mental fog (n=8/125, 6.4%), hair loss (n=8/125, 6.4%) and desire for a natural product (n=7/125, 5.6%) 2. Percentage of patients complaining of fatigue/weight gain in euthyroid state: 16/125 (12.8%) of patients on Armour Thyroid and 29/125 (23.2%) of patients on levothyroxine had complaints of fatigue and weight gain with a normal TSH. This 10.4% difference was significant (p value=0.033, 95% CI 0.84% to 19.8%). 3. Presence of side effects: 24/125 (19.2%) patients on Armour Thyroid discontinued it before 6 months. The top reasons were no improvement of symptoms (n=9/24, 37.5%), palpitations (n=5/24, 20.8%), worsening anxiety (n=3/24, 12.5%), cost (n=2/24, 8.33%), and loss of appetite (n=2/24, 8.33%). 5/125 (4.00%) patients on levothyroxine chose to discontinue it before 6 months. The reasons included presence of palpitations (n=3/5, 60.0%), hair loss (n=1/5, 20.0%), and gluten intolerance (n=1/5, 20.0%). A total of 11/125 (8.8%) had adverse effects from Armour Thyroid while 4/125 (3.2%) of patients on levothyroxine had adverse effects to the medication. The difference of 5.6% leaned toward clinical significance and trended toward being statistically significant (p value=0.06, CI -0.4842% to 12.1677%). Our research shows that patients generally feel better on Armour Thyroid compared to levothyroxine. Armour Thyroid is an effective medication to use for patients who remain symptomatic on levothyroxine and should be considered as a viable option in clinical practice. However, our study also indicated that patients may have more adverse effects on Armour Thyroid when compared to levothyroxine and further studies are needed comparing the two medications. Limitations of our study include the retrospective nature of the study and the sample size.