Background
Although the risk factors for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) mortality have been identified, there is limited information about the risk factors for disease progression after hospitalization among Japanese patients with COVID-19 exhibiting no or mild symptoms.
Methods
All 302 consecutive patients who were admitted to our institutions and diagnosed with COVID-19 between March and December 2020 were retrospectively assessed. Ultimately, 210 adult patients exhibiting no or mild symptoms on admission were included in the analysis. They were categorized into the stable (no oxygen needed) and worsened (oxygen needed) groups, and their characteristics and laboratory data were compared.
Results
Among 210 patients, 49 progressed to a severe disease stage, whereas 161 did not. The mean patient age was 52.14 years, and 126 (60.0%) patients were male. The mean body mass index (BMI) was 23.0 kg/m2, and 71 patients were overweight (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2). Multivariate logistic analysis showed that old age, overweight, diabetes mellitus (DM), and high serum ferritin levels were independent risk factors for disease progression.
Conclusions
Clinicians should closely observe patients with COVID-19, especially those with risk factors such as old age, overweight, DM, and high serum ferritin levels, regardless of whether they have no or mild symptoms.
An elderly patient with multiple myeloma (MM) was being treated with several regimens and developed a severe drug eruption, necessitating the use of atovaquone instead of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) prophylaxis. For progressive MM, treatment with isatuximab, an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody, was started. During the treatment, he developed Listeria monocytogenes bacteremia and recovered quickly with ampicillin administration. CD38 is closely related to the innate immune response against L. monocytogenes, and isatuximab may increase the risk of infection. Therefore, trimethoprimsulfamethoxazole may be useful in the prevention of not only PCP but also L. monocytogenes infection.
Objective
Infections after a second hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) occur commonly and are associated with high mortality. However, studies on bloodstream infection (BSI) after a second HSCT are lacking. We therefore evaluated the details of BSI after a second HSCT.
Methods
We retrospectively evaluated the incidence, etiology, risk factors, and outcomes of BSI after a second HSCT.
Patients
Fifty-two adult patients with hematological malignancies who underwent allogeneic HSCT, including cord blood transplantation (CBT; n=33), as the second transplantation were enrolled. The second transplantation was limited to allogeneic HSCT. Patients who underwent HSCT for graft failure were excluded.
Results
The median HSCT interval was 438 (range: 39-3,893) days. Overall, 31 (59.6%) patients received autologous HSCT as the first HSCT. The cumulative incidence of BSI was 40.4% at 100 days after the second HSCT, with Gram-positive bacteria accounting for the majority (30.8%) of pathogens. Overall, 92.0% of BSIs occurred during the pre-engraftment period, and
Enterococcus faecium
accounted for 29.6% of pathogens. On a multivariate analysis, CBT was most closely associated with pre-engraftment BSI after the second HSCT (hazard ratio: 3.43, 95% confidence interval: 1.05-11.23, p=0.042). The 1-year survival rate after the second HSCT was lower in patients with BSI than in patients without BSI (p=0.10).
Conclusion
BSI is common after a second HSCT, especially with CBT. During the pre-engraftment period, BSI caused by pathogens such as
E. faecium
should be anticipated and appropriately treated to improve transplant outcomes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.