This report presents our experience with a case of pancreatic metastasis of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) at a long-term follow-up after nephrectomy. A 73-year-old man underwent nephrectomy for right RCC 21 years ago; computed tomography (CT) scanning on routine follow-up revealed a solid mass in the tail of the pancreas, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed some tumors in the head and tail of the pancreas. The patient was asymptomatic and allergic to contrast medium. Therefore we could not perform contrast CT/MRI for further examination to diagnose pancreatic tumors. We undertook endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and detected a hypervascular and low echoic mass; tumor tissues were obtained by EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA). Pathological diagnosis revealed pancreatic metastasis of clear cell RCC; this was similar to the pathological findings of tumor tissues initially obtained by nephrectomy. EUS-FNA was extremely useful for the definitive diagnosis of a rare type of pancreatic tumor.

Background and study aims A 71-year old female who received low anterior resection for rectal cancer visited Komatsu Municipal Hospital with complaints of passing feces from the vagina. Endoscopic examination revealed a postsurgical rectovaginal fistula. Medical approaches, including nonoperative management, initial endoscopic closure, transvaginal and endorectal surgery, and fecal diversion, were unsuccessful. Therefore, the patient underwent endoscopy with a pre-procedural endoscopic creation of mucosal pin holes around the fistula opening and clip insertion into the rectal wall in combination with electrocautery and clip closure. This novel approach was effective in achieving permanent closure of the fistula in a single procedure. Most rectovaginal fistulas are surgically managed, however, surgery may be more difficult, invasive, and unsatisfactory for refractory fistulas. Although endoscopic treatment with over-the-scope clips has been increasingly used as a less invasive approach for gastrointestinal fistulas with favorable results, it is not as effective for refractory rectovaginal fistulas. As a minimally invasive surgical procedure, this approach might be effective in small rectovaginal fistulas, particularly refractory ones.