The Adductor Pollicis Muscle Thickness (APMT) value is the numerical value obtained by measuring the thickness that contains components such as tissue, skin, nerve and adipose tissue by means of a caliper. A new anthropometric measurement technique, APMT, is promising for clinical use in conditions such as obesity and malnutrition. In this study, it is aimed to compare APMT measurement with other anthropometric measurements in overweight-obese and normal weight female individuals. Healthy female individuals living in Sivas, between the ages of 18-25, overweight-obese and with normal weight were included in the study. APMT measurements were taken from both the right and left hands of the participants. The measurements were repeated twice and the average of the measurements was taken. The study sample was divided into normal weight and overweight-obese groups. A total of 46 individuals were included in the study by including 23 women in the groups. While obese individuals constitute 15.2% of the sample; overweight individuals constitute 34.8%. While APMT-R was 15.37±1.90, APMT-L was 15.04±1.78 mm in individuals with normal weight; APMT-R was 17.10±2.81 and APMT-L was 16.69±22.75 mm in overweight and obese individuals. APMT and APMT index values measured on both the right and left hands were found to be higher in overweight-obese individuals than in individuals with normal weight (p

Objective: The aim of the authors of this study was to determine the reference values for the Adductor Pollicis Muscle Thickness (APMT) in individuals belonging to a healthy population and to compare these values with other anthropometric measurements. Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, the APMT in the dominant and non-dominant hands of 385 healthy individuals categorized according to age and gender variables were measured with a caliper. Individuals in the “A” category according to the Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) test were included in the study, and anthropometric measurements. Results: In the study, 193 women and 192 men were included, and various anthropometric measurements were taken. The mean APMT values of the dominant and non-dominant hands were 20.87 ± 3.23 mm and 19.28 ± 2.93 mm in men and 16.78 ± 3.10 mm and 15.43 ± 2.92 mm in women, respectively, which indicates that there were significant differences between the members of the two genders and between the members of the same gender (p<0.001). There was a high level of positive correlation between the mean APMT values of the dominant hand and the mid-upper arm circumference (p<0.001). Conclusion: In this study, a high-level and positive correlation was found between APMT values and mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC), mid-upper arm muscle circumference (MUAMC) and mid-upper arm muscle area (AMA) values. APMT measurement emerges as a useful and new anthropometric measurement method in the assessment of the nutritional status of a person.