Objective: Each hour of delay in antibiotics administration increases mortality in sepsis. The aim of this study was to decrease the bacteria identification time to initiate appropriate antibiotic treatment as early as possible. Method: Tests were applied to 39 Gram negative bacteria isolated from blood cultures sent to our laboratory from intensive care units between November 2015- February 2016. The results of bacterial identification tested on both microarray and LFM methods were compared. Results: In the comparison of MALDI-TOF MS after sub-culture, MALDI-TOF after lysis centrifugation and microarray methods, sensitivity was determined as 82% (32/39) in LFM and as 87.1% (34/39) in the microarray method. All three methods had a concordance of 76.9% (30/39). Most common species identified in this study were Acinetobacter spp., Klebsiella spp. and Escherichia spp., and their Cohen’s Kappa coefficients for LFM and post-subculture MALDI were calculated as 0.715, 0.843, and 0.938, respectively. In addition, their BC-GN microarray and post-subculture MALDI concordance rates calculated with Cohen’s Kappa were 0.935, 0.753 and 0.938, respectively. Both methods showed good correlations with the post-culture MALDI method. Conclusion: Lysis centrifugation and microarray platforms decrease the identification time in blood culture processing successfully. Results of this study suggest that for the laboratories with MALDI-TOF mass spectrophotometer, the lysis filtration method is a fast and cost-effective method that may be suitable for routine procedures.
Background
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has different clinical courses in children and adults. The majority of coronavirus diseases 2019 (COVID-19) caused by SARS-CoV-2 are either mild or asymptomatic in children.
This report aimed to determine quantitative antibody levels against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in children with COVID-19 and MIS-C.
Methods
A single-center retrospective study was conducted at a tertiary-level university hospital. Seventy-five pediatric patients diagnosed with COVID-19 and MIS-C were included between September 2021 and February 2022.
The demographic, clinical and laboratory data of cases were extracted from medical records. The duration of hospitalization, management, and outcomes was reported.
Quantitative antibody levels against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in the third month after the initial diagnosis was measured, and patients were also evaluated for post-COVID-19 syndrome symptoms .
Results
The patients were categorized into three disease phenotypes; there were 36 (48%) patients with mild/asymptomatic (group1)( M/F 20/16, mean age, 11.4 years) 22 (29.3%) patients with moderate to severe SARS-CoV-2 infection (group 2)(M/F 13/9, mean age, 13 years) and 17 (22.6%) patients with MIS-C (group 3)( M/F 9/8, mean age, 10.1 years).
The majority of the children in group 1 (80.6%), in group 2(90.9%), and in group 3(82.4%) had a detectable IgG antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 spike protein(p=0.567). The mean antibody values against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein was 321.9±411.6 in group 1, 274±261 in group 2, and 220±299 in group 3 (p >0.05).
The antibody positivity rate was similar in patients with COVID-19(85.5%) and MIS-C (82.4%) (p=0.833). The mean antibody value against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein was 303.9±360.3 in the COVID-19 group and 220 ±299 in the MIS-C group(p >0.05).
Conclusion
The majority of the children had a detectable IgG antibody level to SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. There was no difference between asymptomatic/mild disease, moderate/severe disease, and MIS-C groups in mean antibody levels. Long-term studies are needed to examine antibody responses over time in children with COVID-19 and MIS-C for different vaccination schedules.
Disclosures
All Authors: No reported disclosures.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.