Genome-wide copy number analyses of human cancers identified a frequent 5p13 amplification in multiple solid tumor types, including lung (56%), ovarian (38%), breast (32%), prostate (37%) and melanoma (32%). Integrative analysis of the region identifies a Golgi protein, GOLPH3, as a candidate targeted for amplification. Gain- and loss-of-function studies in vitro and in vivo validated GOLPH3 as a potent oncogene. Physically, GOLPH3 localizes to the trans-Golgi network and interacts with components of the retromer complex, which in yeast has been linked to TOR signaling. Mechanistically, GOLPH3 regulates cell size, enhances growth factor-induced mTOR signaling in human cancer cells and alters response to mTOR inhibitor in vivo. Thus, reinforcing genomic and genetic, biological, functional and biochemical data in yeast and humans establish GOLPH3 as a novel oncogene that is commonly targeted for amplification in human cancer and capable of modulating the response to rapamycin, a cancer drug in clinical use.
Non-small cell lung cancers with activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) are highly responsive to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), such as gefitinib and erlotinib. Such cancers are ''addicted'' to EGFR, and treatment with a TKI invariably leads to down-regulation of the PI3K-AKT-mTOR and MEK-ERK signaling pathways, resulting in apoptosis. Using a dual PI3K-mTOR inhibitor, NVP-BEZ235, we evaluated whether PI3K-mTOR inhibition alone induced apoptosis in these cancers. In contrast to HER2-amplified breast cancers, we found that PI3K-mTOR inhibition did not promote substantial apoptosis in the EGFR mutant lung cancers. However, blocking both PI3K-mTOR and MEK simultaneously led to apoptosis to similar levels as the EGFR TKIs, suggesting that downregulation of these pathways may account for much of the apoptosis promoted by EGFR inhibition. In EGFR mutant lung cancers, downregulation of both intracellular pathways converged on the BH3 family of proteins regulating apoptosis. PI3K inhibition led to downregulation of Mcl-1, and MEK inhibition led to up-regulation of BIM. In fact, down-regulation of Mcl-1 by siRNA was sufficient to sensitize these cancers to single-agent MEK inhibitors. Surprisingly, an AKT inhibitor did not decrease Mcl-1 levels, and when combined with MEK inhibitors, failed to induce apoptosis. Importantly, we observed that the combination of PI3K-mTOR and MEK inhibitors effectively shrunk tumors in a transgenic and xenograft model of EGFR T790M-L858R cancers. These data indicate simultaneous inhibition of PI3K-mTOR and MEK signaling is an effective strategy for treating EGFR mutant lung cancers, including those with acquired resistance to EGFR TKIs.ver the past few years, it has become clear that non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) with activating mutations in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) are particularly sensitive to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), and this has emerged as another example of a successful targeted therapy paradigm [reviewed in (1)]. Similarly, breast cancers with amplification of HER2 are often sensitive to HER2 TKIs (lapatinib) and antibodies (trastuzumab) (2, 3).Mounting evidence indicates that both the PI3K-AKT-mTOR and the MEK-ERK pathways are strictly regulated by either EGFR or HER2 in cancers that respond to inhibitors of these RTKs (4). For a cancer to respond to an EGFR TKI, treatment must lead to down-regulation of these intracellular signaling pathways. When most cancers, such as KRAS-mutated cancers, are treated with EGFR TKIs, these intracellular pathways are unaffected, and these cancers are thus de novo resistant (5). In contrast, lung cancers with EGFR mutations have PI3K-AKT-mTOR and MEK-ERK under the sole regulation of EGFR, and when treated with an EGFR TKI, these pathways turn off and the cells undergo substantial apoptosis. However, it remains unknown whether down-regulation of the PI3K-AKT-mTOR, MEK-ERK, or both pathways together is sufficient to recapitulate the apoptotic effects induced by the TKI. Indeed, ...
ErbB3 is a critical activator of phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) signaling in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR; ErbB1), ErbB2 [human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)], and [hepatocyte growth factor receptor (MET)] addicted cancers, and reactivation of ErbB3 is a prominent method for cancers to become resistant to ErbB inhibitors. In this study, we evaluated the in vivo efficacy of a therapeutic anti-ErbB3 antibody, MM-121. We found that MM-121 effectively blocked ligand-dependent activation of ErbB3 induced by either EGFR, HER2, or MET. Assessment of several cancer cell lines revealed that MM-121 reduced basal ErbB3 phosphorylation most effectively in cancers possessing ligand-dependent activation of ErbB3. In those cancers, MM-121 treatment led to decreased ErbB3 phosphorylation and, in some instances, decreased ErbB3 expression. The efficacy of single-agent MM-121 was also examined in xenograft models. A machine learning algorithm found that MM-121 was most effective against xenografts with evidence of ligand-dependent activation of ErbB3. We subsequently investigated whether MM-121 treatment could abrogate resistance to anti-EGFR therapies by preventing reactivation of ErbB3. We observed that an EGFR mutant lung cancer cell line (HCC827), made resistant to gefitinib by exogenous heregulin, was resensitized by MM-121. In addition, we found that a de novo lung cancer mouse model induced by EGFR T790M-L858R rapidly became resistant to cetuximab. Resistance was associated with an increase in heregulin expression and ErbB3 activation. However, concomitant cetuximab treatment with MM-121 blocked reactivation of ErbB3 and resulted in a sustained and durable response. Thus, these results suggest that targeting ErbB3 with MM-121 can be an effective therapeutic strategy for cancers with ligand-dependent activation of ErbB3. Cancer Res; 70(6); 2485-94. ©2010 AACR.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.