Background Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most prevalent malignancies in the world. Long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) nuclear enriched abundant transcript 1 (NEAT1) is involved in the development of many cancers. However, its role and mechanism in CRC progression still need further exploration. Methods The expression levels of lnc-NEAT1, microRNA-150-5p (miR-150-5p) and cleavage and polyadenylation specific factor 4 (CPSF4) were determined by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). The sensitivity of cells to 5-fluorouracil (5-Fu) was measured by 3-(4,5-dimethyl-2 thiazolyl)-2,5-diphenyl-2-H-tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. Cell apoptosis and invasion were evaluated by flow cytometry and transwell assays, respectively. Western blot (WB) analysis was used to assess the levels of resistance-related proteins and CPSF4 protein. Besides, dual-luciferase reporter assay was used to verify the interactions among lnc-NEAT1, miR-150-5p and CPSF4. Also, mice xenograft models were used to determine the effect of lnc-NEAT1 on CRC tumor growth in vivo. Results In CRC, the expression of lnc-NEAT1 was upregulated and miR-150-5p was downregulated, and the expression of both was negatively correlated. Silencing of lnc-NEAT1 promoted the 5-Fu sensitivity, enhanced the apoptosis and suppressed the invasion of CRC cells. MiR-150-5p could be sponged by lnc-NEAT1, and its inhibitors could partially reverse the effect of lnc-NEAT1 silencing on CRC progression. Besides, CPSF4 could be targeted by miR-150-5p, and its overexpression also could invert the effect of lnc-NEAT1 knockdown on CRC progression. Further, CPSF4 expression was regulated by lnc-NEAT1 and miR-150-5p. In addition, interference of lnc-NEAT1 reduced tumor volume and improved the sensitivity of CRC to 5-Fu in vivo. Conclusion Lnc-NEAT1 acted as an oncogene in CRC through regulating CPSF4 expression by sponging miR-150-5p. The discovery of lnc-NEAT1/miR-150-5p/CPSF4 axis provided a novel approach for CRC genomic therapy strategy.

BackgroundRecent wide spread use of low-dose helical computed tomography for the screening of lung cancer have led to an increase in the detection rate of very faint and smaller lesions known as ground-glass opacity nodules. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical factors of lung cancer patients with solitary ground-glass opacity pulmonary nodules on computed tomography.MethodsA total of 423 resected solitary ground-glass opacity nodules were retrospectively evaluated. We analyzed the clinical, imaging and pathological data and investigated the clinical differences in patient with adenocarcinoma in situ / minimally invasive adenocarcinoma and those with invasive adenocarcinoma.ResultsThree hundred and ninety-three adenocarcinomas (92.9%) and 30 benign nodules were diagnosed. Age, the history of family cancer, serum carcinoembryonic antigen level, tumor size, ground-glass opacity types, and bubble-like sign in chest CT differed significantly between adenocarcinoma in situ / minimally invasive adenocarcinoma and invasive adenocarcinoma (p:0.008, 0.046, 0.000, 0.000, 0.000 and 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic curves and univariate analysis revealed that patients with more than 58.5 years, a serum carcinoembryonic antigen level > 1.970 μg/L, a tumor size> 13.50 mm, mixed ground-glass opacity nodules and a bubble-like sign were more likely to be diagnosed as invasive adenocarcinoma. The combination of five factors above had an area under the curve of 0.91, with a sensitivity of 82% and a specificity of 87%.ConclusionThe five-factor combination helps us to distinguish adenocarcinoma in situ / minimally invasive adenocarcinoma from invasive adenocarcinoma and to perform appropriate surgery for solitory ground-glass opacity nodules.