Background There are inadequate data and no histological evidence regarding the effects of antiviral treatment for hepatitis B e-antigen (HBeAg)-negative chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients with normal or mildly elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT). This study investigated the effects of antiviral treatment on these patients. Methods We retrospectively analysed the outcomes of antiviral treatment for HBeAg-negative CHB patients with normal or mildly elevated ALT who were treated with nucleoside/nucleotide analogues (NAs) for up to 96 weeks. Results A total of 128 patients were enrolled; 74 patients had normal ALT and 54 patients had mildly elevated ALT. The total cumulative rates of viral suppression were 64.06%, 81.97%, and 96.39%, at weeks 24, 48, and 96, respectively. The cumulative rates of viral suppression for the normal and mildly elevated ALT groups were 67.85% and 58.97%, 86.39% and 76.31%, and 93.13% and 97.04% at weeks 24, 48, and 96, respectively. The serum HBV DNA levels at week 12 and hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) levels at week 24 were significant predictors of the 96-week virological response. Of the 128 patients, 54 with normal ALT and 33 with mildly elevated ALT underwent FibroScan at baseline. Significant fibrosis (F ≥ 2) was found in 44.4% (n = 24) and 51.5% (n = 17) of the patients in the normal ALT group and mildly elevated ALT group, respectively. Compared with the values at baseline, liver stiffness values significantly decreased at week 48 (8.12 kPa vs. 6.57 kPa; p < 0.001) and week 96 (8.87 kPa vs. 6.43 kPa; p < 0.001), respectively. Conclusions HBeAg-negative CHB patients with normal ALT could benefit from antiviral therapy with NAs, similar to patients with mildly elevated ALT. Antiviral treatment is strongly recommended for HBeAg-negative CHB patients with normal ALT. Additionally, significant liver fibrosis is not rare in HBeAg-negative CHB patients with ALT less than two-times the upper limit of normal, and FibroScan should be performed regularly for these patients.

Context: When nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) were applied clinically to manage chronic hepatitis B virus infection, the prognosis of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients greatly improved. However, certain CHB patients with normal alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels were not used to be considered as the population with the need for antiviral treatment. Objectives: This systematic review and meta-analysis collected and analyzed data from clinical trials to assess and compare the efficacy of antiviral treatment among patients with elevated and normal ALT levels. Methods: A systematic search was performed to gather studies published from 1990.01 to 2022.08 in PubMed and Web of Science databases. The quality of the literature was assessed, and 16 studies were included for further analysis. Basic information on included studies and study populations was collected. A meta-analysis was carried out to evaluate three major outcomes of viral response, hepatitis B envelope antigen (HBeAg) loss, and HBeAg seroconversion after NAs treatment based on data extracted from these studies. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for all outcomes were calculated using fixed-effects models. Results: In the 16 relevant studies, 5,345 patients met the inclusion criteria, including 3,687 patients receiving NAs treatment. All patients were grouped into one with elevated ALT and another with normal ALT based on whether their pretreatment ALT levels > 1*upper limit of normal (ULN). For patients receiving lamivudine, the viral response showed no significant difference between the groups with elevated and normal ALT levels (pooled log OR: 0.51 [-0.23 - 1.26], P = 0.79); the pooled log OR for HBeAg loss was 1.19 (0.63 - 1.76, P = 0.03) and pooled log OR for HBeAg seroconversion was 2.19 (0.91 - 3.47, P = 0.40). For patients receiving first-line therapy with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and entecavir (ETV), the viral response showed no significant difference between the two groups: Pooled log OR (0.38 [-0.22 - 0.97], P = 0.10). The pooled log OR for HBeAg loss and HBeAg seroconversion was (-0.07 [-0.81 - 0.67], P = 0.68) and (0.40 [-0.84 - 1.63], P = 0.88), respectively. Conclusions: The efficacies of first-line therapy with TDF and ETV treatments were similar in groups with elevated and normal ALT levels for the outcomes of viral response and HBeAg loss. These findings may support further treatment of CHB patients with normal ALT levels.

Neuroimmune interactions have been studied for decades. Several neurodevelopmental disorders have been associated with immune dysfunction. However, the effects of immune system on neuronal function remain unknown. Herein, based on c-Fos protein expression, we characterized the brain areas that are activated after contextual fear conditioning (CFC) training or retrieval in severe combined immune deficiency (SCID) and wild-type mice. Further, we analyzed the interregional correlations of c-Fos activity that are affected by deficiency in adaptive immunity. Results showed significantly lower c-Fos density in learning and memory-associated brain regions of SCID mice after memory retrieval, but not during the CFC training. Moreover, SCID mice exhibited remarkably discordant interregional neuronal activities of learning neuron circuits after CFC training, which could be the cause of inefficient activation of the memory circuit after retrieval. These results provide a new perspective on how adaptive immunity affects neuronal function. Adaptive immune deficiency impairs the coordination of neural activity after training and retrieval, which might be a potential therapeutic target for neurodevelopmental disorders.