PEBI ("perpendicular bisector") grids have been shown in the past to have the potential to reduce computational times for the simulation of relatively straight-forward processes. It is the purpose of this paper to investigate PEBI-based gridding for a much more complex thermal process in a full field setting using commercial simulation products. The goals are to study both computing efficiency and accuracy by comparing results obtained by modelling a field using the more conventional corner point-based gridding with local grid refinement to those obtained using a PEBI gridding approach. The field in question has been produced for about 20 years, with an operational history that includes cyclic steam stimulation in portions of the field. Many vertical faults have been mapped in the reservoir, and over 140 wells, many of them deviated or horizontal, have been drilled. A simulation study had been done using approximately 170 000 active corner point cells. It was found that the inclusion of foamy oil behaviour was necessary to get a good match of the production history. It appeared though that this simulation was lacking in accuracy near horizontal wells. This was probably due to the inability of the model to align its locally refined grids properly with many of the wells, and the difficulty in getting reasonable refinement levels where cyclic steam stimulation was being carried out, without making the problem considerably larger. A second simulation study was carried out using a PEBI-based grid. The more flexible aspects of this gridding system allowed construction of a better aligned grid, especially near the horizontal wells and near faults. Moreover, the characteristics of the PEBI-based grid also allowed efficient grading of grid cell sizes, so that particularly fine-scale gridding could be used near wells, while still maintaining an overall model size that was about half that of the corner point model. All processes modelled in the original simulation were replicated in the PEBI-gridded model, including the foamy oil and thermal aspects. The PEBI gridded model ran in about a third of the time of the original corner point model, and showed accuracy improvements which were attributable to the better placement of grid cells. These results showed that the simulator's ILU-based sparse matrix solver technology was very capable of computing in an unstructured grid environment, even while using cells near wells that were smaller than those used in the corner point model. Thus, PEBI-based gridding can be used to efficiently model complex processes in a full field setting. These grids can demonstrably improve accuracy and are much more adaptable for modelling near wells and in a complex geological setting. A three-fold run time improvement was noted for the field in question when comparing to a more conventional, corner point gridded model. Introduction PEBI ("perpendicular bisector") grids were introduced into reservoir simulation as early as 1989(1). These early grids used stacked layers with a PEBI grid in each layer. The construction of these two-dimensional PEBI grids could be based on first laying down a collection of nodes (points) in the reservoir, and then constructing a cell around each node that consists of all points in the reservoir that are closer to that particular node than any other. The resulting (several-sided) cells form what is known as a Voronoi tessellation(2), and the cells become the "control volumes" for the discretization. The associated PEBI grid is the triangulation that consists of the nodes and connecting segments that join pairs of nodes wherever the nodes' associated cells meet at a common face. The procedure of building the triangulation as a dual grid to a Voronoi tessellation shows why the inter-nodal segments between connected nodes are perpendicular to their associated common faces, and why the faces intersect the mid-points of the segments; hence the term, "perpendicular bisector". Of course, the preceding discussion ignores numerous details concerning node layout, boundaries, and many other issues, and is only meant for illustration, but it does give a brief indication of how things might work.
TX 75083-3836, U.S.A., fax 01-972-952-9435. AbstractCreation of a simulation grid that accurately represents the reservoir and enables efficient numerical solutions is often one of the most important steps in constructing a reservoir simulation model. Complex structural settings can present particular challenges in this respect. This paper demonstrates a novel approach to this problem: the use of PEBI grids, which are unstructured and extremely flexible, with a commercial reservoir simulator that was designed primarily for structured Cartesian or corner-point grids.This unconventional combination of techniques is accomplished without a significant change in workflow. The PEBI grid -a combination of Cartesian and irregular grid blocks -is first built to represent the necessary geologic and well detail. Then the grid is made compatible with a conventional reservoir simulator by treating the irregular parts of the grid as non-standard gridblock connections to their neighboring Cartesian blocks.The business example comes from a development study of a highly faulted reservoir group located in the Gulf of Mexico. Associated structural complexity includes steeply dipping beds, sloping, directional wells cutting through faults, and interbedded shale layers. A comparison of simulation results from PEBI and conventional rectangular and curvilinear gridbased models illuminates the advantages of PEBI grids for this project: a more accurate representation of geologic detail with less effort, more computational stability, and reduced cycle times for model updates following geologic model revisions.
TX 75083-3836, U.S.A., fax 01-972-952-9435. AbstractCreation of a simulation grid that accurately represents the reservoir and enables efficient numerical solutions is often one of the most important steps in constructing a reservoir simulation model. Complex structural settings can present particular challenges in this respect. This paper demonstrates a novel approach to this problem: the use of PEBI grids, which are unstructured and extremely flexible, with a commercial reservoir simulator that was designed primarily for structured Cartesian or corner-point grids.This unconventional combination of techniques is accomplished without a significant change in workflow. The PEBI grid -a combination of Cartesian and irregular grid blocks -is first built to represent the necessary geologic and well detail. Then the grid is made compatible with a conventional reservoir simulator by treating the irregular parts of the grid as non-standard gridblock connections to their neighboring Cartesian blocks.The business example comes from a development study of a highly faulted reservoir group located in the Gulf of Mexico. Associated structural complexity includes steeply dipping beds, sloping, directional wells cutting through faults, and interbedded shale layers. A comparison of simulation results from PEBI and conventional rectangular and curvilinear gridbased models illuminates the advantages of PEBI grids for this project: a more accurate representation of geologic detail with less effort, more computational stability, and reduced cycle times for model updates following geologic model revisions.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.