The role of missense changes in BRCA1 in breast cancer susceptibility has been difficult to establish. We used comparative evolutionary methods to identify potential functionally important amino acid sites in exon 11 and missense changes likely to disrupt gene function, aligning sequences from 57 eutherian mammals and categorizing amino acid sites by degree of conservation. We used Bayesian phylogenetic analyses to determine relationships among orthologs and identify codons evolving under positive selection. Most conserved residues occur in a region with the highest concentration of protein-interacting domains. Rapidly evolving residues are concentrated in the RAD51-interacting domain, suggesting that selection is acting most strongly on the role of BRCA1 in DNA repair. Investigation of the functional role of missense changes in breast-cancer susceptibility should focus on 38 missense changes in conserved and 3 in rapidly evolving regions of exon 11. breast cancer ͉ exon 11 ͉ gene evolution ͉ missense change ͉ BRCA1 P rotein-truncating mutations distributed across BRCA1 are associated with an increased cumulative lifetime risk of breast (60-80%) and ovarian (20-40%) cancer (reviewed in ref. 1). Known mutations in breast-cancer susceptibility genes have been collated in the Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) database (2, 3). Nearly half the reported changes in BRCA1 are frameshift mutations and thus expected to be disease associated (2). Most of the rest are missense changes; 323 of these have been reported in 1,735 individual entries. Disease-association status is known for only a fraction of these: in the RING finger domain (4) and the C-terminal region of the protein (5, 6). Case-control and family studies are underpowered to draw conclusions regarding the remainder; these are not highly penetrant alleles (7-9).The BRCA1 gene encodes a 1,863-aa protein with a single large region, exon 11, encoding some 60%. The gene is highly polymorphic, with many common single-base exon changes. Regions interacting with other proteins have been identified, but structural and biochemical properties of the protein remain largely unknown, making it difficult to predict the consequences of any single missense change (10). Available functional assays are time-consuming, expensive, and applicable only to Cterminal mutations (6,11,12). Predictions regarding missense changes can be strengthened by comparative evolutionary analysis to establish whether mutations cluster in conserved regions (13)(14)(15). Such analyses may be particularly helpful in identifying low-penetrance missense changes in functionally important regions. Phylogenetic approaches can also determine whether certain residues have evolved more rapidly than predicted by neutral theory (the ratio of the rate of nonsynonymous to synonymous substitution, , Ͼ1), reflecting the action of positive (diversifying) selection (16,17).The ability to detect conserved (18-20) and rapidly evolving (21, 22) regions in BRCA1 has been limited by the small number of cloned sequences ...
Sea otter (Enhydra lutris) populations experienced widespread reduction and extirpation due to the fur trade of the 18th and 19th centuries. We examined genetic variation within four microsatellite markers and the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) d-loop in one prefur trade population and compared it to five modern populations to determine potential losses in genetic variation. While mtDNA sequence variability was low within both modern and extinct populations, analysis of microsatellite allelic data revealed that the prefur trade population had significantly more variation than all the extant sea otter populations. Reduced genetic variation may lead to inbreeding depression and we believe sea otter populations should be closely monitored for potential associated negative effects.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.