Biofilms are at the root of many infections largely because they are much more antibiotic resistant than their planktonic counterparts. Antibiotics that target the biofilm phenotype are desperately needed, but there is still no standard method to assess biofilm drug susceptibility. Staphylococcus epidermidis ATCC 35984 biofilms treated with eight different approved antibiotics and five different experimental compounds were exposed to the oxidation reduction indicator Alamar blue for 60 min, and reduction relative to untreated controls was determined visually and spectrophotometrically. The minimum biofilm inhibitory concentration was defined as <50% reduction and a purplish well 60 min after the addition of Alamar blue. All of the approved antibiotics had biofilm MICs (MBICs) of >512 g/ml (most >4,096 g/ml), and four of the experimental compounds had MBICs of <128 g/ml. The experimental aaptamine derivative hystatin 3 was used to correlate Alamar blue reduction with 2,3-bis(2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium-5-carboxanilide (XTT) reduction and viable counts (CFU/ml) for S. epidermidis ATCC 35984, ATCC 12228, and two clinical isolates. For all four strains, Alamar blue results correlated well with XTT (r ؍ 0.83 to 0.97) and with CFU/ml results (r ؍ 0.85 to 0.94). Alamar blue's stability and lack of toxicity allowed CFU/ml to be determined from the same wells as Alamar blue absorbances. If the described method of microplate Alamar blue biofilm susceptibility testing, which is simple, reproducible, cost-effective, nontoxic, and amenable to high throughput, is applicable to other important biofilm forming species, it should greatly facilitate the discovery of biofilm specific agents.Given the tremendous clinical importance of biofilms, it is somewhat surprising that there is no standard method for investigating the drug susceptibility of bacterial biofilms. Several methods are available but are limited by long processing times, incompatibility with high throughput, expensive reagents or equipment, or the fact that the method measures mass instead of viability (2,4,7,13,14,24,25). For bacteria, a common method of assessing susceptibility is to quantitate the mass of biofilms by crystal violet or safranin staining, followed by extraction of bound dye with a solvent and measurement of absorption (6,24). This method provides no information about viability. Another common method of assessing bacterial biofilm susceptibility is to disrupt the biofilm by sonication, vortexing, or scraping, followed by dilution plating for determination of CFU/ml (27,28,31). This method has serious limitations; biofilm clumps can be difficult to dissociate into single-cell suspensions for plate counting, it is extremely laborious, and antibiotic carryover is a concern. For fungi, the most common method is an XTT [2,3-bis(2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium-5-carboxanilide] reduction assay (1,8,25), and this method has also been used for bacterial biofilms (1). While XTT reduction does measure metabolic activity,...
Biological organisms orchestrate coordinated responses to external stimuli through temporal fluctuations in protein-protein interaction networks using molecular mechanisms such as the synthesis and recognition of polyubiquitin (polyUb) chains on signaling adaptor proteins. One of the pivotal chemical steps in ubiquitination involves reaction of a lysine amino group with a thioester group on an activated E2, or ubiquitin conjugation enzyme, to form an amide bond between Ub and a target protein. In this study, we demonstrate a nominal 14-fold range for the rate of the chemical step, k(cat), catalyzed by different E2 enzymes using non-steady-state, single-turnover assays. However, the observed range for k(cat) is as large as ∼100-fold for steady-state, single-turnover assays. Biochemical assays were used in combination with measurement of the underlying protein-protein interaction kinetics using NMR line-shape and ZZ-exchange analyses to determine the rate of polyUb chain synthesis catalyzed by the heterodimeric E2 enzyme Ubc13-Mms2. Modest variations in substrate affinity and k(cat) can achieve functional diversity in E2 mechanism, thereby influencing the biological outcomes of polyubiquitination. E2 enzymes achieve reaction rate enhancements through electrostatic effects such as suppression of substrate lysine pK(a) and stabilization of transition states by the preorganized, polar enzyme active site as well as the entropic effects of binding. Importantly, modestly proficient enzymes such as E2s maintain the ability to tune reaction rates; this may confer a biological advantage for achieving specificity in the diverse cellular roles for which these enzymes are involved.
The alarming spread of multiple drug resistance in Staphylococcus aureus, combined with the frequent occurrence of S. aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis in biofilm-type infections, indicates a growing need for new therapies. The experimental steroidal amide anprocide [3β-acetoxy-17β-(l-prolyl)amino-5α-androstane] significantly reduced c.f.u. ml−1 per suture (P <0.0001) in a murine model of topical S. aureus infection. In chequerboard assays with planktonic-grown S. aureus and S. epidermidis, anprocide was synergistic with bacitracin, oxacillin, clindamycin or ceftriaxone. Anprocide was also synergistic in combination with bacitracin or oxacillin against some isolates of biofilm-grown S. aureus and S. epidermidis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.