Sarcomas of the sinonasal region are rare. We describe a distinct spindle cell sarcoma of the sinonasal region characterized by concomitant neural and myogenic differentiation. Consultation files and surgical cases from Mayo Clinic were reviewed. Twenty-eight cases were identified that met the inclusion criteria. Clinical data were collected from medical records, consultation letters, and referring pathologists. Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction for synovial sarcoma fusion transcripts was performed on 18 cases. Cytogenetic studies were performed on 2 cases. The 21 female and 7 male patients ranged in age from 24 to 85 years (mean, 52 y). All cases showed a characteristic histology, which included a cellular spindle cell neoplasm with uniform, elongate nuclei and an infiltrative growth pattern. All tumors demonstrated expression of S-100 with actin positivity in 96% of cases tested. Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction for synovial sarcoma fusion transcripts was negative in all cases tested. Cytogenetic studies conducted on 2 cases demonstrated the chromosomal translocation t(2;4). The nasal cavity (54%) and ethmoid sinus (57%) were the most commonly involved areas, singly or in combination. Follow-up information was available for 57% (16/28) of cases, with a mean of 8.3 years. Of these, 44% (7/16) experienced at least 1 recurrence. No patient has developed metastases or died of disease. We describe a unique tumor with a characteristic morphologic, immunophenotypic, and cytogenetic profile. On the basis of the locally aggressive nature of this lesion we believe it is best considered a low-grade sarcoma and suggest the term low-grade sinonasal sarcoma with neural and myogenic features.

The determination of HER2 amplification is critical to selecting appropriate patients for HER2 targeted therapy in breast cancer. Dual in situ hybridization (DISH), an alternative to fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry, is now available. To compare the FISH and DISH methods, we tested 251 samples enriched for common or difficult-to-assess HER2 anomalies. Seven samples failed DISH testing. There was a 64% (156/244) concordance between FISH and DISH by anomaly (κ = 0.58, 95% confidence interval, 0.51-0.65; P < .0001) and an 83% (203/244) concordance by amplification status (κ = 0.58; 95% confidence interval, 0.47-0.69; P < .0001). DISH resulted in lower estimates of HER2/ centromere 17 ratios than FISH, and many cases that were equivocal with FISH were normal with DISH. DISH did not detect any case with coamplification of HER2 and centromere 17. Using a cohort of difficult specimens, we observed less than 95% concordance between FISH and DISH. DISH may underestimate the HER2/chromosome 17 ratio, or FISH may overestimate this ratio.

No abstract

No abstract

Cytogenetic evolution (CGE) in patients with myeloid neoplasms who relapsed after an allogeneic (allo) hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) has been evaluated by only few studies. The effect of the CGE on survival of relapsed allo-HCT recipients is not clear. The effect of previously received chemotherapy to induce CGE in this patient population has not been studied. The aims of our study are to (1) characterize the patterns of cytogenetic change in patients with myeloid neoplasms who relapsed after an allo-HCT, (2) evaluate the effect of CGE on survival, and (3) explore the association of CGE with previous chemotherapy (including the lines of salvage therapy, type of induction, and conditioning therapy). Of 49 patients with a myeloid malignancy (27 acute myeloid leukemia [AML], 19 myelodysplastic syndrome [MDS]/myeloproliferative neoplasm [MPN], and 3 chronic myelogenous leukemia) who relapsed after an allo-HCT, CGE was observed in 25 (51%), whereas 24 patients had unchanged cytogenetic findings at relapse. The CGE group carried more cytogenetic abnormalities at original diagnosis. The most frequent cytogenetic change was the acquisition of 3 or more new chromosomal abnormalities followed by acquisition of unbalanced abnormalities, aneuploidy, and emergence of apparently new clones unrelated to the original clone. The CGE cohort had higher proportion of MDS and MPN and fewer patients with de novo AML. Disease risk assessment category showed a trend to higher frequency of high-risk patients in the CGE group, though the difference was not statistically significant. Time from diagnosis to transplantation and time from transplantation to relapse were not different between the CGE and non-CGE groups. CGE and non-CGE cohorts had similar exposures to salvage therapy and to induction chemotherapy, as well as similar conditioning regimens; thus, no particular type of chemotherapy emerged as a predisposing factor to CGE. CGE was associated with significantly shortened post-transplantation and postrelapse survival when compared with those of the non-CGE group (P = .004 and P < .001, respectively). Our results underscore the significance of CGE in progression of myeloid malignancies after an allo-HCT.