Dental caries is a ubiquitous disease affecting all age groups and segments of the population. It is known that not all caries lesions progress to cavitation, but little is known regarding the progression pattern of caries lesions. This study's purpose was to evaluate the natural history of dental caries using a standardized, visually based system, the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS). The study population consisted of 565 consenting children, who were enrolled and examined at baseline and at regular intervals over 48 months with ICDAS and yearly bitewing radiographs. Of these, 338 children completed all examinations. Not all lesions cavitated at the same rate, differing by surface type and baseline ICDAS severity score and activity status. With increasing severity, the percentage of lesions progressing to cavitation increased: 19%, 32%, 68%, and 66% for ICDAS scores 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. Lesions on occlusal surfaces were more likely to cavitate, followed by buccal pits, lingual grooves, proximal surfaces, and buccal and lingual surfaces. Cavitation was more likely on molars, followed by pre-molars and anterior teeth. Predictors of cavitation included age, gender, surfaces and tooth types, and ICDAS severity/activity at baseline. In conclusion, characterization of lesion severity with ICDAS can be a strong predictor of lesion progression to cavitation.

No abstract

The objective of this research was to evaluate the anticaries effectiveness of a low-dose (500 ppm F, low-NaF) sodium fluoride dentifrice, a high-dose (2,800 ppm F, high-NaF) sodium fluoride dentifrice and an experimental 0.454% stabilized stannous fluoride (1,100 ppm F) with sodium hexametaphosphate (SnF₂-HMP) dentifrice, each relative to a standard 1,100 ppm F sodium fluoride positive control dentifrice. Subjects (n = 955, with ∼239 per group) with a mean age of 10.6 (∼9–12 years) were randomly assigned to one of four dentifrice treatments. Two calibrated examiners independently measured visual-tactile caries as DMFS that was supplemented with a radiographic examination at baseline, 12 months and 24 months for each subject. Generally similar results were independently observed by both examiners at the conclusion of the 2-year study period. Considering all subjects that attended at least 60% of the supervised brushing sessions, statistically significantly less caries was observed in the high-NaF group compared to the control group. Similarly, statistically significantly less caries was observed in the SnF₂-HMP group as compared to the control group. Differences in caries increments between the low-NaF and control groups were not statistically significant. One of the examiners observed these same statistically significant differences after 1 year. In conclusion, the results of this clinical trial indicated that while no difference in caries increments was observed between the low-NaF and control groups, both the high-NaF and the SnF₂-HMP groups experienced significantly fewer lesions than the control group.

The purpose of this three-month clinical trial was to evaluate the effects of a 0.1% octenidine mouthrinse on plaque, gingivitis, extrinsic dental stain, and the oral soft tissues. A total of 451 adult volunteer subjects was initiated into the study and given baseline dental examinations. The subjects were stratified into two balanced groups according to gender, plaque, and gingivitis scores. The subjects then received a dental prophylaxis and were provided with dentifrice, toothbrushes, and either a mouthrinse containing 0.1% octenidine dihydrochloride as the active ingredient or a similar placebo mouthrinse. Subjects were instructed to rinse with their assigned product for 30 s twice each day. Examinations were repeated at six weeks (soft-tissue assessment, gingivitis) and three months (soft tissues, plaque, gingivitis, dental stain). The results showed that the group rinsing with 0.1% octenidine had significantly less plaque (39%), gingivitis (50%), and bleeding sites (60%) than the group using the control product, but had significantly higher stain formation and experienced longer prophylaxis times to remove the stain. The oral soft-tissue examinations revealed no differences in the groups in either the numbers or types of lesions noted.